Nonprofit redux

I enjoyed the recent article on nonprofits [“Sharing the Wealth,” April 9] and also thought Mr. Evan’s follow-up letter [“Looking the Gift Horse in the Mouth,” April 16] made some good points. There is middle ground between the two, and some ground not covered by either. It is true that charities tend to be inefficient in both equitable distribution of services and in addressing related problems across a wide spectrum. This is not a criticism. They often do a great deal with very little in their specific mission.

I disagree with Mr. Evans about the role of democracy. A large part of the Reagan Revolution was the intentional decentralization of health, cultural, educational and environmental concerns. Charities may receive public funds, but the voters have already excused themselves from the process. Some organizations took up the slack. Others are still wondering what hit them. In a competitive environment, stronger groups succeed. This should not be confused as a judgment of their mission or the needs they serve.

Nonprofits are facing new funding pressures. Volunteers are getting older, and precious few of them have included charity in their estate plan. Younger donors often focus less on local organizations. Wages, after inflation, have been dropping steadily for many years. The estate-tax exemption is in a state of political flux. While it is a moving target, many families have a hard time making commitments.

The solution lies in individual responsibility. Individuals make commitments. Committed individuals build communities. Communities can do more than the sum of the parts. As a citizen, you can support the causes you love with time and maybe a little more money than you have given in the past. If you want their good work to last, leave them something when you are gone. Talk to your friends about doing the same. Above all, have faith that your support makes a difference.

— Skip Helms
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.