Nuclear waste needs another route

I am part of a group of students who have been researching the effectiveness of nuclear power and are deeply concerned about the plans to [locate] nuclear reprocessing facilities in South Carolina and Tennessee.

Not only are these plants proven to be inefficient and to add to nuclear waste, but also all the shipments of spent nuclear fuel coming down from the north would likely pass right through Asheville. [The waste] would be shipped down on trucks weighing around 300,000 pounds, in currently untested TAD (Transport and Aging Disposal) units, and will be constantly radiating as the trucks drive up and down the highway.

There have been many nuclear accidents and mishaps in the past. What makes them think that there won’t be any accidents or screwups while transporting all this waste around?

An accident involving one of these trucks could contaminate the area for thousands of years, completely destroying the area around it.

We’re taking a stand against this for future generations and ourselves. Will you just sit and let this happen? Or will you stand up and say no to nuclear reprocessing?

— Quinn Scobie
Fletcher

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Nuclear waste needs another route

  1. travelah

    Looks like the MountainX wanted some saturation coverage this week …. I’m all for many more nuclear power plants.

Leave a Reply to travelah ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.