Smart growth or faux history?

In reading the recent Mountain Xpress article highlighting the Five Points Village development [“Broadway Doubles Down,” July 30], I was disappointed to see the demolition of the historic “Pink House” described as being a good thing for the community.

The Pink House was actually called the Broadway Market Building and was listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was considered to be a significant early decorative-concrete-block structure and a rare remaining example of a two-story mixed-use building. The building had definitely suffered from years of neglect, but the developers could have made use of federal and state tax credits that are available to encourage owners to rehabilitate these important historic structures.

Smart growth along the Broadway corridor connecting downtown and UNCA has the potential to improve the city of Asheville, and rehabilitating the Broadway Market Building would have helped give real context to the new streetscape. Instead, we will get a cluster of new buildings designed to “[take] a lot of historic buildings into account.”

The Five Points Village design isn’t the only new downtown-development project trying to sell itself by being historic-looking. Other recent examples are the Ellington Hotel, designed to be look like a high-rise Douglas Ellington never envisioned; and the Haywood Park Tower, designed to look like the Grove Arcade Tower that was never built.

As an architect, I understand the difficulties and costs associated with renovating historic structures, but part of what makes this city great is that we have saved so many of our old buildings. It gives Asheville a unique sense of place. Growth, development and change are going to happen, but we will benefit much more from maintaining our historic structures, and infilling with sensitive new development, than we will by tearing [those buildings] down, to be replaced by faux-historic structures that only parody the past.

— Diana Bellgowan
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Smart growth or faux history?

  1. hauntedheadnc

    Whenever an architect gets het up about the issue of “parodying the past” this is usually their veiled way of admitting that modern architects are incapable of building anything as beautiful or worth caring as much about as the buildings of the past.

    If architects truly believed in progressive architecture, they would accept the notion that the forms and decorations of the past are as valid as the buildings they keep inflicting on us that look like piles of discarded electronics, dented refrigerator cartons (or the refrigerators themselves), or cancerous growths.

    What’s wrong with reviving something good? It’s every bit as valid an idea as insisting that a building must look like and have the charm of a parking deck in order to faithfully represent today’s reality.

  2. supermom

    There’s nothing wrong with revivals – the greek revival style was lovely. One just has to be careful that it doesn’t turn into Disneyworld, with its fake facades and “ideal” architecture.

    Why not keep the real, instead of building new meant to merely look like the real? Silliness.

  3. travelah

    … early decorative-concrete-block structure ha!

    A LOT of Asheville is crappy looking … the streets just got a tad bit better.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.