Stuart Peterson’s sentence may be too lenient. Here’s why …

A young, 20-year-old man committed "armed robbery" with a "gun" and received a three-years-and-eight-months sentence. This was premeditated. I do not know Stuart Peterson or anyone in that article ["Justice Undone?" Dec. 2 Xpress], but to me this sentence seems extremely lenient for such a crime, and that must be because it was his first felony arrest. Mr. Forbes fails to mention his past record of arrests other than "tales of his former life were hard to believe"; that speaks for itself. Thank God he didn't shoot anyone during the perpetration of his crime.

What I have to wonder is if Stu thinks that his sentence is unjustified? You must remember the "at gunpoint" aspect. His new family has only known him a mere six months — [a family made up of] court-appointed therapists, substance-abuse treatment counselors and an employer he likes. But how long did Stu Peterson choose his extended gang family? The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior! If he proves his new "change" is not just a façade, he'll get out early, and maybe turn it all around.

Everyone has a right to arm themselves legally. But criminals will always have illegal guns. To get guns out of the hands of desperados is simple: If you use a gun in the performance of a crime, you (and anyone with you) [should] get an additional 20 years tacked onto the sentence(s) with no chance of parole; that will end gun violence as we know it. Even gang-bangers can grasp that notion.

I am not unsympathetic towards his mother. But when my pregnant daughter-in-law called me sobbing that my 30-year-old son had been gone for days on a crack binge, I advocated for "tough love" and went straight to the police to get him out of the crack house and into treatment. They did, they were wonderful, and they saved his life! Police will help when parents are taking a positive hard stance. Sometimes not "protecting" your child is the hardest choice a parent ever has to make!

— Kate Crawford

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Stuart Peterson’s sentence may be too lenient. Here’s why …

  1. travelah

    Ms Crawford, I admire your willingness to speak forthrightly in these matters and agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments.

  2. Pedro

    Did she really just write “desperados”?? now that’s funny!!!

  3. john

    Kudos to Katie Crawford and her easily understood (even by the politically-correct among us) common-sense solutions. What an amazing concept: Actions have consequences. Hold people responsible for their actions. Her statement about guns is so true. I’ve never heard of a gun that jumped into someone’s hands and made them rob someone or pull the trigger.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.