Xpress’ reporting on June City Council meeting was too selective

I was disappointed to read the Mountain Xpress’ coverage of the City Council meeting concerning stream-side buffer requirements [”Asheville City Council Approves a Stormwater Plan and Endorses Public Finances of Elections,” June 9]. I spoke for nearly ten minutes to Council, trying to promote sensible and fair buffer requirements. In pointing out how the enforcement of buffer requirements are not equally applied in Asheville, I gave several examples of large nonprofit projects that do not meet current buffer ordinances or general construction practices. I also spoke about future water-quality projects that would require total realignment of stream beds. The point of my remarks to Council was that stream-side buffers are more of a political issue than one of water quality, and this was really a referendum on who rules the roost here and will direct Asheville’s future growth.

The Mountain Xpress claims to promote “thoughtful and diverse community dialogue” but did not mention any of my comments when writing the article about this Council meeting. I can only guess that this is because I gave, in the Xpress’ opinion, a politically incorrect view in discussing how unfair the entire issue is for small property owners and builders. I am tired of media outlets that promote “news” from a specific political point of view, and I find it difficult to watch or read any of them.

In the future, I would ask the Xpress to report all of the facts and sides of a story and let the public make up its own mind. Most of us are intelligent enough to decide how we stand on an issue if we are given the whole story.

— Pete Hildebrand
Chunn's Cove

Editor’s response: We edit City Council reports (and all news stories) for length, style and clarity, never because someone gives a politically incorrect view. Some meetings feature dozens of speakers, depending on the issue. There is simply no way to include everyone.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Xpress’ reporting on June City Council meeting was too selective

  1. Gotta say, as a former reporter and editor for Xpress, that I think the Twittering going on during Council meetings has interfered with real reporting.

Leave a Reply to cecibothwell ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.