Xpress response was condescending

As a faithful reader of the Mountain Xpress, I was shocked and disappointed by your firing of reporter Cecil Bothwell. I am stunned by your action and very concerned about the direction of your publication. Bothwell is a powerful part of what makes your paper “alternative” from the news perspective, and that is precisely what I am looking for when I pick up the Xpress each week. While I find your entertainment features amusing, it is my interest in learning about issues affecting this community—beyond what appears in mainstream media—that has kept me reading your paper. It concerns me deeply to know that you have fired a contributor who strived to give voice to views often ignored in this community.

But what really got me to write was your “official” response to readers on mountainx.com. It smacked of condescension and ass-covering. There is a smug tone as you note that Cecil sent out “his own press release,” as though that is not totally within his right. You also take some pseudo “high road” as you imply that Bothwell had it coming, but that you’re just too noble to tell us why (but we would totally agree if we only knew). Yet you add [that] you really hope he’ll continue to be a contributor?

I have had the opportunity to get to know Cecil Bothwell and believe him to be a man of honesty, integrity and tireless commitment to social and environmental justice. You may not always have agreed with him, or maybe he presented positions not popular with advertisers or officials, but isn’t that what we want in reporters—especially for a paper that touts itself as alternative? I know I do, and I feel betrayed by your actions.

— Liza Cherner

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Xpress response was condescending

  1. travelah

    Do you know the details of why he was fired? If you do not, why are you condemning his former employer? It just might be that he was fired for something unrelated to his journalistic capabilities.

  2. Take5

    A careful reading of Fobes’/Elliston’s snide editorial–which squandered 6 paragraphs of condescension and innuendo before actually hinting at the reasons why they might be displeased with Bothwell–would seem to arrive at this conclusion: Bothwell was fired for being “passionate.” They reiterate over and over his “passion” as if it were some uncontrollable vice or emotional imbalance that tarnished his work [not].

    Fobes et al., doesn’t give a sh*t. He knows Ashevillians will move on to some other ephemeral gripe in a few weeks, and come back and read the paper for the entertainment section. Sad that Julian Price couldn’t have saved AGR like he saved Fobes’ Green Line.

  3. travelah

    Take5, you do not know the reason he was fired. Have you ever had to fire anybody? The reasons for doing so are not usually made public unless there has been a crime committed.

  4. Johnny

    Agreed, travelah. We simply do not know why, we should not know why, and it’s wrong to make inferences about it one way or the other.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.