Why are N.C. lawmakers pushing the use of drones without public debate?

In this file photo from a May 27 Xpress cover story on drones, Clark Cross pilots one of the unmanned aircraft systems. A drone proposal is under consideration in the N.C. General Assembly's omnibus budget bill. Photo by Clarke Morrison

By Rob Schofield

The subject of unmanned aircraft systems — often referred to as “drones” — and their use in American airspace is obviously an enormously complex and controversial subject. In addition to simple safety concerns (a drone landed on the White House lawn earlier this year, for Pete’s sake!), the prospect of thousands of camera-equipped machines flying over private homes and businesses at the behest of the government and/or corporate interests raises all kinds of questions about privacy, the Fourth Amendment and, as Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously described it, “the right to be let alone.”

Add to this obvious reality the technological advances of recent years and the pressure on drone manufacturers to find new markets for their wares given the declining role of the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan, and it’s pretty obvious that this is a subject in need of serious public dialogue.

Americans may, in the end, decide that the advantages of drones — for public safety work, for agriculture and perhaps even for delivering Amazon packages — outweigh the safety and privacy concerns. If they do, though, it seems like a relatively modest request that such a decision take place after at least a reasonable measure of debate in which the pros and cons are publicly aired and sifted.

Unfortunately — especially given the feelings of paranoia that drones, by their very nature, tend to spur in a lot of people — open discussion and debate have not featured prominently in the equation in North Carolina. To the contrary, virtually all of the steps taken by state government in recent years in this important and potentially worrisome area have been shrouded in secrecy and mystery.

Consider the following: Last year, after reports surfaced detailing the close connections between the forces pushing for drone expansion (manufacturers, the military, law enforcement and the conservative corporate lobby group known as ALEC) and the folks championing the cause in the General Assembly, the issue seemed to disappear. Lawmakers, we were told, were going to study the issue.

Nearly six months later, however, the issue miraculously re-emerged in a “special provision” slipped anonymously into the state budget bill with no debate or discussion. As a result, a new law making it easier for drones to be used by law enforcement officers and others passed without debate.

Now fast-forward to the present.

House leaders have once again taken the extraordinary step of slipping another drone proposal into the omnibus budget bill. While the House did, to its credit, actually hear and pass a separate bill on the topic earlier this year before inserting it into the budget, the leaders seem uninterested in allowing the usual legislative process to run its course by allowing the Senate to take the matter up in a substantive committee that would feature public testimony and open debate.

What’s more, the new proposal includes some worrisome substantive provisions —perhaps most notably that it vests vast authority for approving drone operations (and even releasing personal information obtained via drone surveillance) in one person: North Carolina’s Chief Information Officer (or CIO) — a fellow named Chris Estes.

Estes, who in his role heads a branch of government known as the Office of Information and Technology Services, has no background as a judge, law enforcement officer or even an attorney. He came to the job instead after many years working for various corporate giants. Most recently, he was the head of the “Strategy, Technology, and Innovation practice” for the security and defense contractor Booz, Allen Hamilton. Add to this the close connections between North Carolina drone efforts and the U.S. military and the use of the former compound of the disgraced Blackwater outfit for testing, and the issue gets even murkier.

None of this, of course, is to necessarily insinuate some kind of nefarious conspiracy or even, for that matter, destructive motives. It is, however, to call attention to a major issue with potentially far-reaching and even dangerous implications that’s proceeding apace in our state with virtually zero public oversight or awareness.

A spokesperson for the conservative John Locke Foundation recently indicated that the group would favor, at a minimum, some additional protections to clarify what’s on and off limits to government drones. Let’s hope state lawmakers heed this obvious advice and that advocates for privacy don’t have to send in a drone of their own the next time they want to know what our elected officials are doing on this important subject.

Rob Schofield is the director of research and policy development at N.C. Policy Watch, a project of the nonprofit North Carolina Justice Center.

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Why are N.C. lawmakers pushing the use of drones without public debate?

  1. bsummers

    Thanks Rob. There’s still apparently a moratorium on reporting this stuff in the NC media. It only gets out there through “opinion” pieces like yours.

    IMO, along with the obvious police surveillance issues, here is the answer to the question you ask in your title. Should we be concerned? Damn right:

    When The Reapers Come Home: a look at the plan to open US domestic airspace to military drones.
    http://reaperscomehome.blogspot.com/

  2. Ms. Cris Ericson

    THIS IS A NATIONWIDE NEW PRIVACY ISSUE!
    Letter to the Editor of The Vermont Journal/The Shopper
    publisher@vermontjournal.com;editor@vermontjournal.com

    http://www.wptz.com/news/faa-approves-first-vermont-drone-business/33294176
    … the first Vermont based DRONE business has been federally approved for
    commercial use of aerial drones…. helping the FAA collect data for
    possible future regulation… Airshark http://www.airshark.io/

    I have never, in my entire life, ever heard of collecting information by a
    federal agency just in case they can pull off some possible future
    regulation regarding your private, personal and property information
    which they will now be collecting by using small drones, prior to enacting
    their fantasy future regulation!

    Is there a local gun club that could interpret how high in the sky above
    our homes we are allowed to shoot ufos? Are we allowed to shoot
    them at all above our homes? What about bow and arrow hunting
    season to take down unmanned small invasive aerial drones?
    What if these small drones, some the size of birds, are flying past our
    HOME while we have opened windows, private parts uncovered and the breeze
    blows the curtains aside; or the heat is so stifling we open the window
    while freshly naked from the shower? O.K., if we can’t shoot them with
    guns, can we use slingshots? Can we throw tomatoes at them?

    I came across a “goprodroneclub” on facebook. Can we attack back
    with our own drones to protect our privacy? How much space outside
    our windows and our roof is “ours”? Did you know you can buy a cute
    little parrot drone? Can you use your parrot drone to lead theirs astray?
    Please tell me what device we can legally use to disrupt the gps on the
    small but invasive aerial drones and make them go away?

    This has to be a violation of Copyright Infringement Federal
    Laws for them to photograph your private property and you in your home.

    http://www.airshark.io advertises that they do “Photography for Marketing,
    Reporting & Communication”.

    pages.cs.wisc.edu/~suman/pubs/airshark.pdf
    Airshark—a system that detects multiple non-WiFi RF devices in real-time.
    Airshark detects non-WiFi devices (Bluetooth, Cordless phones,
    Microwave ovens).

    Airshark: A System for Automating Wireless Diagnostics and Analysis
    i2c.calit2.net/entries/etp/7ca5fb8cc765d74116f6cac1055176d3.pdf

    http://research.cs.wisc.edu/wings/projects/airshark
    Project Description: Wireless interference.

    http://www.networkworld.com Airshark can identify Bluetooth and ZigBee devices,
    cordless phones, wireless video cameras and Xboxes with accuracy.

    http://www.wptz.com/news/whats-next-airshark/30295594
    AirShark makes and flies custom drones with a variety of sensors to get aerial
    video, thermal imaging, 3D mapping…

    from: Ms. Cris Ericson, 879 Church Street, Chester, Vermont 05143
    (802)875-4038

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.