Waterloo

Movie Information

In Brief: Riding on the artistic success of his 400-plus minute War and Peace (1966), Soviet director Sergey Bondarchuk was handed this English-language multinational production of more tractable length but equal spectacle. It was a huge flop when it appeared in 1970 — perhaps because spectacle was its only real selling point. And on that basis, it is impressive. Otherwise, well, we get Rod Steiger as a very sweaty, very Method-acting Napoleon — and while that's a spectacle in itself, it's not of the desirable kind. Christopher Plummer's coolly detached Duke of Wellington fares better, but the film's basically a plodding affair of doubtful practical value — apart from its sheer size. The Hendersonville Film Society will show Waterloo Sunday, Sept. 28, at 2 p.m. in the Smoky Mountain Theater at Lake Pointe Landing Retirement Community (behind Epic Cinemas), 333 Thompson St., Hendersonville.
Score:

Genre: War Epic
Director: Sergey Bondarchuk
Starring: Rod Steiger, Christopher Plummer, Orson Welles, Jack Hawkins, Virginia McKenna
Rated: G

waterloo

 

I freely admit that it took me three tries to make it all the way through Sergey Bondarchuk’s Waterloo (1970). For me at least, it’s that kind of picture. Yes, it’s big. It’s epic. It’s especially impressive when you realize that in those quaint pre-CGI days, all those thousands of dress extras are actually there. OK, that’s all in the plus column, though I confess that after awhile a certain epic overkill sets in. How many shots of soldiers on horseback, soldiers on foot, soldiers in mud, soldiers firing cannons and so on before it all runs together? Impressive, sure? But as drama, well, that’s another matter.

 

waterloo3

 

 

There’s no shortage of drama, however, in Rod Steiger’s Napoleon. I don’t suppose any actor ever worked so hard at trying to become the character he was playing. Problem is — at least for me — the harder he tries the more he is just Rod Steiger straining to be someone else. That’s certainly the case with his sweaty, over-emotional, petulant Napoleon. I never believe him for a moment, but I am almost mesmerized by the effort he puts into it. In Waterloo it’s even more pronounced since he’s up against Christopher Plummer’s effortlessly elegant Duke of Wellington. Plummer is easily the best thing about the picture. The two never have any scenes together, but there’s a long stretch where the film cuts between the two that offers a study in contrasts — and an unintentional contest of performers. Plummer wins.

 

waterloo4

 

When Waterloo came out it turned out to be a gigantic flop. Various reasons have been given. Some hold water. Some don’t. The idea that no one was in the mood for a war movie in the midst of Vietnam sounds good till you realize that Patton was a major hit the same year. That it was a period film seems more solid and probably has some bearing on it. But mightn’t it also be that it’s just a tough slog of a movie?

The Hendersonville Film Society will show Waterloo Sunday, Sept. 28, at 2 p.m. in the Smoky Mountain Theater at Lake Pointe Landing Retirement Community (behind Epic Cinemas), 333 Thompson St., Hendersonville.

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.