The House at the End of Time

Movie Information

In Brief: Alejandro Hidalgo's The House at the End of Time (2013) is exhibit B for the case that we are indeed in the midst of a horror film renaissance -- the only question is how much some of the best examples are even being seen. In the case of this Venezuelan movie (supposedly the country's first horror picture), the answer is very little indeed -- at least in the U.S. It was never released here, though it did play at at least one horror film festival. That's not entirely surprising considering that a horror movie with no known stars and subtitles is generally a pretty hard sell, but that doesn't mean it's not a great pity. It may look like a standard haunted house movie on the surface -- and it plays with those tropes -- but this is really a finely crafted supernatural thriller of a very different -- and startlingly complex -- kind. The film starts in 1981 when Dulce (Ruddy Rodriguez) finds her husband (Gonzalo Cubero) murdered in the cellar and sees her son, Leopoldo (Rosmel Bustamante), vanish. Since her fingerprints are on the murder weapon and there are no other suspects, she's sentenced to prison. Thirty years later finds her being released on compassionate leave -- but only to the confines of her old home. There -- sometimes with the help of a sympathetic priest (Guillermo Garcia) -- she begins to understand what happened. Through a series of flashbacks and strange occurences -- some of which are truly scary -- the whole of the fantastic story is slowly revealed, leading to a surprising -- and thoroughly satisfying -- climax. Be there.  
Score:

Genre: Horror Fantasy
Director: Alejandro Hidalgo
Starring: Ruddy Rodríguez, Rosmel Bustamante, Guillermo García, Gonzalo Cubero, Héctor Mercado
Rated: NR

houseatend

 

It slightly amuses me that a kind of big deal has been made out of the fact that The House at the End of Time is Venezuela’s first horror movie. Honestly, I can’t name you a single other Venezuelan film in any other genre. That may be a barometer of my insularity, but I think what it attests to is more that horror pictures are the most exportable things going. Intriguingly, horror fans — often perceived as less intellectual than average moviegoers — seem to have far less resistance to subtitled films than the general public. Truthfully, calling this a horror film sells it short. (In fact, some horror fans dismiss it as not really being a horror film, which also sells it short.) It is most decidedly a film containing supernatural elements and there are a number of solid shock scenes.

 

house at

 

But it’s ultimately not the kind of supernatural horror we’re used to. It’s not even the kind of supernatural horror it at first seems to be. What kind is it? Well, that can’t be revealed without revealing a lot more than should be told. The film is a puzzle — a puzzle where almost nothing is what it seems, but one where everything is connected and where everything will ultimately make sense — even to how the apparently innocent Dulce’s fingerprints got on the knife that killed her husband. Note, however, that it only makes sense if you accept what is actually a heavy-duty supernatural — or maybe paranormal — premise involving the house of the title.

 

house at 2

 

At first glance, as I said, this looks like it’s going to be a straightforward haunted house movie. Even Dulce believes she’s living in a haunted house story (see subtitle on photo above). There’s also no shortage of genre trappings — including a really creepy and genuinely unsettling seance that isn’t quite like anything I’ve ever seen. And there are all the requisite scares and things that go bump in the night. But as the film unfolds, it becomes evident that there’s something much deeper than these trappings going on here. I won’t say it’s all perfect. The interiors of the house look rather tackier and cheaper than the exterior of the house suggests, for example. But the compensations are enormous.

 

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “The House at the End of Time

  1. Reeves Singleton

    I thought this was pretty darn good, if fairly clunky in a few places. Actually, some of that may be alleviated by a second viewing and knowing just how everything ultimately plays out. (I was mostly bothered by how the movie tended to introduce and give notable weight to a few seemingly extraneous characters for no obvious reason, but its resolution ties everything together in such a way that makes that complaint meaningless). Regardless, and whether it finally is a “real” horror film, I would say its shock effects are probably the most, uh, effective of any of the recent spate of great horror movies, and its plotting gloriously conceived. It’s certainly one to catch.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.