Earnest and sincere to the point of painfulness (assuming you’re not one of the already converted), Kim Kindersley’s documentary Whaledreamers (2006) is a visually compelling work that suffers from trying to cover too many bases in one movie. I’m not at all sure, however, that it could ever be other than it is, since its ultimate topic is the connectedness of all things—something that fits a bit too snugly inside 89 minutes of screen time, especially if, like Kindersley, you want to connect as many of the dots as possible. I will not criticize the film for preaching to the choir, since, let’s face it, that’s what 99 percent of all agenda-driven documentaries and essay films do. (You don’t honestly think political conservatives flock to Michael Moore movies, do you? Or that secular humanists and heathens bought tickets to see the Ben Stein creationism picture?)
My biggest problem with the film lies in its obsession with background detail. This starts with producer Julian Lennon explaining (sort of) his involvement, and then expands to filmmaker Kindersley, who tells us how he left a burgeoning (which is debatable) acting career after having a very ‘60s-style epiphany involving looking into the eye of a dolphin. That started him down this path of involvement with the aboriginal Mirning tribe and the gathering of indigenous elders that’s at the center of his film. It’s all a little too fuzzily mystical for me, but it’s honest, and I’m not sure how he could have left it out. Also, I’m more in sympathy—in broad strokes, at least—with his themes than not. The striking visuals add immeasurably to it, but the more you’re on its wavelength, the more you’ll like it.
Before you comment
The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.