AC-T: Commissioners explain vote on sexual orientation protection

Here’s an excerpt from the Asheville Citizen-Times article:

Two commissioners who voted against protecting Buncombe County employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation dismissed the idea Wednesday as unnecessary and potentially costly.

A proposed rewrite of county personnel policies lists 11 different factors, from race to veteran status, that could not be considered when making employment decisions.

The county Board of Commissioners voted down a proposal to add sexual orientation and gender identity to that list on a 3-2 vote Tuesday night.

Commissioners Carol Peterson and Bill Stanley said they see no evidence of discrimination against gays or lesbians in the county workforce, which currently numbers 1,421. …

. … Extending protections to gay and lesbian employees could force county government to offer health insurance to domestic partners of county employees, whether the couples ar.e same sex or opposite sex, Stanley said. …

… A proponent of more protection said Wednesday it is a false linkage.

“The county could have amended their policy last night. It would have cost them nothing,” said the Rev. Jasmine Beach-Ferrara, executive director of Asheville-based gay rights group Campaign for Southern Equality.

Advocates for more protections said that if gays or lesbians in the county workforce do feel mistreated, they probably will not say anything because current law offers them no protection.

“The reason you don’t see (discrimination complaints) is it is perfectly legal to fire an employee because they’re gay. We have an opportunity to change that,” resident Lindsey Simerly told commissioners.

About Jake Frankel
Jake Frankel is an award-winning journalist who enjoys covering a wide range of topics, from politics and government to business, education and entertainment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

0 thoughts on “AC-T: Commissioners explain vote on sexual orientation protection

  1. jeffsguy

    I am very disappointed that Carol Peterson would use the excuse that “there no evidence of discrimination against gays or lesbians in the county workforce” to vote against this simple amendment to the non-discrimination policy. The LGBTQ community is in constant attack from the right-wing christian community. Witness the Bele Chere preachers that she had a first hand view of during the festival.

    As a board member of Equality North Carolina, I can assure you that we will continue to pursue the end of discrimination in the public workplace statewide. No one should have to be harassed or fired from their job in order to prove discrimination especially if doing so will likely mean being forced out of the workforce legally. Carol Peterson should be ashamed of her weak political response. We will remember.

  2. glolady

    We are suppose to have separation of Church and State. Yet we continue to have Religious damnation rule standards in Society today.

    This is an ethical question for equality in all human lifestyles. Harm non and do as you will.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.