story on Citizen-Times stirs up a storm of comments blogger Jason Sandford recently blasted the Citizen-Times for its paywall, temporarily dropped during last week’s snowstorm. His comments have stirred up a storm of their own.

Sandford wrote:

The hypocrisy of the decision is telling. By its actions, the newspaper leadership is saying is that if its news and coverage is important, it should be free. But when it’s not, you should pay. Come again? Shouldn’t the policy be that if the newspaper’s online content is good enough, essential enough, to charge for it, then the newspaper should always charge for it? If I were a paying online customer, I’d be ticked.

Some agreed with Sandford:

“Thanks for calling it as you see it, Jason.
 As a way to get out of not delivering the paper today they give you a free digital?
 USA Today — is USA yesterday — anything in there I read yesterday on line!
 Just more paper to line your bird cage!”

Others were critical of Sanford, who was laid off by the Citizen-Times last year. Gannett Corp. owns the Citizen-Times.

One comment was aimed back at Sanford: “My perception is that you intentionally set him (editor Josh Awtry) up in order to grind your ‘Gannett Ax.’ “

“Honestly, Jason, I’m starting to feel like any article that you write on the ACT should include a brief disclaimer,” another said.

Media Watcher said: “Why should the Citizen-Times give any of its content away for free, even emergency information? It’s a for-profit company that has to pay its employees and its shareholders. Emergency information is available on (free) television and radio.“


Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

0 thoughts on “ story on Citizen-Times stirs up a storm of comments

  1. Dionysis

    Being the usual cynic that I am, it is one of those vexing, unsolved mysteries as to why anyone would actually pay to read the kind of lame stuff that characterizes that ‘news’paper. It was on shakey ground before they decided to fire those who actually were somewhat like journalists.

    What’s left is worth its weight in used paper.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.