Questions about the judicial races? See the NC Bar Association surveys

Election season includes district and statewide races for North Carolina judicial offices. But these races aren’t often covered by the media. Luckily, the North Carolina Bar Association surveyed more than 4,000 of its member attorneys about the candidates’ qualifications.

Press release

From the North Carolina Bar Association


North Carolina voters will be better informed when they go to the polls this November to elect District Court and Superior Court judges, thanks to information provided as a public service by the North Carolina Bar Association.

The information, derived from surveys of NCBA member attorneys on the qualifications of sitting judges and non-incumbent candidates, is easily accessible via a special webpage,

The webpage features separate, easily downloadable pages on each contested election except for instances where a candidate was appointed to fill a vacancy after the surveys were conducted. The information is organized for voters by county.

The surveys were conducted by the NCBA’s Judicial Performance Evaluation Committee (incumbent judges) in May 2011 and the NCBA’s Administration of Justice Committee (non-incumbent candidates) in March 2012.

Former District Court Judge Nancy Norelli of Charlotte currently chairs the JPE Committee while fellow Charlotte attorney Ted Hennessey is chair of the AOJ Committee.

Incumbent judges were rated from one through five in six categories: integrity and impartiality, legal ability, professionalism, communication, administrative skills and overall performance. Corresponding assessment values for each rating are as follows: 5 (excellent), 4 (good), 3 (average), 2 (below average) and 1 (poor).

Ratings for non-incumbent candidates were assessed on the same scale in virtually the same six categories. The lone exception is the category of integrity and fairness that was utilized in the evaluation of non-incumbent candidates; the category was titled integrity and impartiality in the evaluation of incumbent judges.

The thrust of both survey reports is to provide North Carolina voters with additional information to use when evaluating candidates for judgeships. The ratings assessed to each candidate in no way imply an endorsement or recommendation by the North Carolina Bar Association, its committees or its members.

For the survey of incumbent judges seeking election in 2012, 4,278 attorneys participated and provided more than 27,700 responses. For the survey of non-incumbent judicial candidates seeking election in 2012, 2,649 attorneys participated and provided more than 8,600 responses.

About Margaret Williams
Editor Margaret Williams first wrote for Xpress in 1994. An Alabama native, she has lived in Western North Carolina since 1987 and completed her Masters of Liberal Arts & Sciences from UNC-Asheville in 2016. Follow me @mvwilliams

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.