The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared

Movie Information

The Story: The title pretty much says it all, but hardly covers the incidents contained.  The Lowdown: A very funny, very inventive, cheerfully amoral (but warm-hearted) comedy with an unlikely main character — and a collection of only slightly more probable supporting characters. Fast-paced, darkly humorous, endlessly playful and a must-see.
Genre: Comedy
Director: Felix Herngren
Starring: Robert Gustafsson, Iwar Wiklander, David Wiberg, Mia Skäringer, Jens Hultén, Alan Ford
Rated: R



The improbably — and yet accurately — titled The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared is quite possibly the most pure fun I’ve had at a movie this year. It is also a film I urge you to see as quickly as you can. It opens this Friday (July 24) at The Carolina on a split bill — in other words, it doesn’t have a full set of show times. I’m not terribly surprised by this. After all, it’s a Swedish comedy — albeit one with long stretches of English dialogue — that totally lacks star power. (The biggest name in the film from a U.S. perspective is Alan Ford, doing the same kind of Brit gangster role he’s played in Guy Ritchie movies.) But it does have an elephant, an engaging plot, a roster of appealing (and some appalling) characters, a blistering streak of dark comedy and, oddly enough, a surprisingly generous heart. It’s been likened to (God forbid) Forrest Gump, but, apart from the fact that our title character is involved in certain historical incidents, it’s nothing at all like that. It has a much wickeder sense of humor, a less oblivious hero — and it’s never in the least gooey.




As noted, the title is appropriately descriptive — at least of the basic set-up. Allan Karlsson (Robert Gustafsson) is a not very willing resident in a retirement home — he was put there for getting his revenge on a fox by blowing the animal up — who, on the morning of his 100th birthday, decides to slip out the window of his room and disappear. Well, he disappears as far as the authorities are concerned. We, however, follow him on his adventures — adventures that start when he ends up taking a bus as far as his money will take him. But before he sets off, he ends up in possession of a bulky suitcase that just happens to contain a large quantity of money. The money in question turns out to belong to some ill-tempered and exceedingly inept gangsters — or, more correctly and dangerously, it belongs to their even more ill-tempered boss (Alan Ford). Not surprisingly, the gang wants the money back. Somewhat more surprisingly, Allan — along with Julius (Iwar Wiklander), the man who has taken him in — determine they have as much right to it as anybody. So when they more or less accidentally freeze one of the gang to death, they get rid of the body and go on the run — at least as on the run as one old codger and one very old codger can.




Now, if it sounds like I’ve told you an awful lot of the plot, you don’t know even an eighth of it. Not only is this just the prelude to their preposterous adventures, but along the way, Allan tells us the story of his life. And it can hardly be said that his 100 years lack for incident — starting with his father leaving Sweden for the freedom of Russia, where he’s promptly executed for espousing the virtues of condoms. Along the way to 100, Allan discovers his fondness for blowing things up, becomes involved in the Spanish Civil War and the Manhattan Project — not to mention rubbing shoulders with Franco, Harry Truman, Stalin, Einstein (well, a really dumb Einstein named Thomas) and various lesser luminaries. It’s history as seen through they eyes of a man who just wants to blow things up, and history offers no shortage of opportunities to do this. The film stays pretty carefully away from much in the way of political significance, but that’s reasonable, since Allan is basically just a good guy who will help anyone who asks him, especially if explosives are involved.




The film’s absurd — even downright surreal — version of history fits in nicely and sometimes relates to the film’s central adventures of Allan and Julius, who later add three more members to their team and the aforementioned elephant. Director Felix Hengren keeps it all moving so quickly and effortlessly that the casually preposterous nature of it all seems, if not quite believable, easy enough to accept within the context of the world of the film. It’s fun and funny and outrageous, and you really don’t want to miss it. Rated R for language and some violence.

Playing at Carolina Cinemas.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

22 thoughts on “The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared

  1. Edwin Arnaudin

    It’s been likened to (God forbid) Forrest Gump, but, apart from the fact that our title character is involved in certain historical incidents, it’s nothing at all like that. It has a much wickeder sense of humor, a less oblivious hero — and it’s never in the least gooey.

    It also takes the time to sit with the famous faces and have them played by actors instead of manipulated archival footage, making them more than simply “hey, I know who that is” cameos.

    • Ken Hanke

      I’ve seen the first picture oftener than you have — and, no. Just no.

    • Reeves Singleton

      Yeah, I was really surprised by the size of the audience at the showing I attended. Even better, the crowd responded to it exceptionally well; every joke seemed to hit its mark and everyone appeared to walk away extremely contented by the experience.

      • Ken Hanke

        This is good to hear. I knew — from the box office figures — that it drew well, but since no one had said anything I was at sea over how it went over.

  2. T.rex

    We are on the same page my friend. This film is absolutely outstanding and, come year’s end, will still be held in high regard. Its up on the mantle of 2015 along side Ex Machina and Inside Out and Mr Holmes. Love this film and look forward to reading the book.

      • T.rex

        Im guessing the two you discount are Inside Out and Ex Machina. I must confess I cried my eyes out during the former and I dont even have kids. After re-watching the latter I realized the ending is good but alas, if credits rolled at the moment she entered the elevator……

        • Ken Hanke

          Yes, those are the two. Inside Out has my vote for most overrated film of the year and it had — Bing Bong to one side — no impact whatever on me (and I do have a kid, though she’s older than you). Ex Machina is very good, but it simply hasn’t stayed with me and I have no desire to see it again.

  3. T.rex

    Okay read no further, SPOILERS AFOOT…………I must confess there was only one scene I had a problem with. How would NY construction workers kniw about the Manhattan Project? It was a little bit top secret. This movie is a wonderful fable so I went along with it. Its just a minor critique.

    • Ken Hanke

      Was it? Is anything with over 100,000 people working on it top secret for very long? (The specifics, yes, but the existence…) And construction workers are in fact the most likely people to have heard something.

      • T.rex

        Come to think of it, it could work. Them commie spies could have penetrated the teamsters.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.