The Exorcist

Movie Information

In Brief: For the Halloween season, the Asheville Film Society has booked — from a new DCP rendering of the movie — William Friedkin's horror classic The Exorcist (1973). Friedkin’s film treatment of William Peter Blatty’s best-selling novel about a young girl possessed by a demon originally seemed more an “event” than a great movie. Its popularity had less to do with any intrinsic merit than with the fact that it contained the most overt depictions of horror ever seen in a mainstream film at the time. Friedkin pioneered such in-your-face grotesqueries in a way that earned him a place alongside James Whale (for Frankenstein) or Alfred Hitchcock (for Psycho) in the history of the horror film. Then came the “new and improved” version of the film, familiarly known as Exorcist 2000 for advertising purposes.  However, unlike so many attempts to improve on older films, this one actually lived up to its promise, revealing a depth to the film that actually proves it is a great film after all. It isn’t so much the new version’s added horrors that enhance it as it is that depth of content. There are some “subliminal” inserts, which serve no real function, though they aren’t intrusive. The “spider walk,” on the other hand (in which Linda Blair contortedly descends the stairs), does make the film play more logically, bringing the story to a pitch that makes the subsequent events seem more believably structured. A supreme shudder in a film full of them — and here's a chance to see it on the big screen.
Score:

Genre: Horror
Director: William Friedkin
Starring: Ellen Burstyn, Linda Blair, Max von Sydow, Jason Miller, Lee J. Cobb
Rated: R

ex2

 

Most of The Exorcist’s horrors hold up quite well today, though perhaps the biggest single jolt of all is the simplest shock effect in the film — the telephone suddenly ringing when Father Damien Karras is listening to the tape of the possessed Regan’s rantings. It’s a lesson that Friedkin could have applied elsewhere in the film to great profit, because the least effective and hokiest moments in The Exorcist are also its most elaborate ones. The rotating head looked absurd and phony when the film was new, and time has not improved it, though it may still work a crowd.

 

ex3

 

Where the director’s cut — which in reality is more the writer’s cut —  really scores is in the restoration of much of William Peter Blatty’s more deep-dish thematic concerns. Blatty’s highly personal, Catholic mysticism suffered from Friedkin’s decision to play up the film’s roller-coaster thrills. It may have made good box-office sense, but it took a generally thoughtful story about the mysteries of faith, the nature of sin, guilt and redemption (and our own humanity) and turned it into a more simplistic spook show. Oh, the book was still scary — I remember having to put it aside after one part when I was 19 — but (to put it crudely) Blatty had ideas; Friedkin had split-pea soup — a significant difference. Not to diminish Friedkin’s mastery, mind you — his ability to create and sustain a sense of dread is unparalleled. (Just look at the film’s first 10 minutes — the scenes in Northern Iraq — to see what I mean.) But with the full cut we have a film that has both ideas and split-pea soup, and it’s definitely deeper and more disturbing, as a result. Blatty’s concerns and preoccupations are both fascinating and worthwhile in this version of The Exorcist, which now seems more of a piece with his own The Ninth Configuration and The Exorcist III.

 

bottom

 

Oh, sure, Linda Blair is still amateurish in many scenes, and it’s the overdubbed voice of character actress Mercedes McCambridge during the possession scenes that gives Blair’s performance its effectiveness. (The original idea was not to credit McCambridge and her onscreen credit is just a “Thanks to” nod.) Lee J. Cobb’s police detective, Kinderman, is good, but he’s so totally eclipsed by George C. Scott’s portrayal of the character in Exorcist III that he doesn’t come across as strongly as he might. That said, even in this expanded version, Cobb’s character is given somewhat short shrift, though he does wonders with what he has to work with. The rest of the cast, however, could scarcely be bettered. It’s a delight to be reminded what a dynamic performer Ellen Burstyn can be. And it’s something of a puzzling disappointment to wonder why Jason Miller never had the career his portrayal of Father Karras suggested he should have had.

The Asheville Film Society is showing The Exorcist Wednesday, Oct. 21, at 8:00 p.m. at The Carolina Asheville as part of the Budget Big Screen Series. Admission is $6 for AFS members and $8 for the general public. Xpress movie critics Ken Hanke and Justin Souther will introduce the film.

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “The Exorcist

  1. Barry

    It’s good to see someone point out the hokeyness of the head-spinning scene, which would have been bad enough once, but used twice (!). I was always somewhat amazed that audiences seemed to accept the non-fatal results of that; if Blair’s head had detached itself and flown around the room to return to her torso and reattach itself, it would not have been less plausible. Although the head-rotation is in the book, Blatty makes it clear that it is a delusion forced on the mother by the demon, brilliantly emphasizing the way the movie director was murdered. Friedkin’s version is entirely too literal.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.