Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Movie Information

The Story: New developments take place at Hogwarts School as the Ministry of Magic sets out to discredit Harry and headmaster Albus Dumbledore and their claims that Lord Voldemort has returned. The Lowdown: Rich, dark and very sinister, this is a terrific addition to the series.
Genre: Fantasy Horror
Director: David Yates
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman
Rated: PG-13

I realized the other day that although I’ve liked every one of the Harry Potter films to one degree or another, I really can’t remember very much about any of them other than Alfonso Cuaron’s Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004). The storylines have all jumbled in my mind, so the exact plot of any given title is vague to me, to say the least. I come to these films as a casual admirer and make no claims to expert status in the realm Potterdom. That said, I find the whole concept of a series of books and films that become increasingly mature as they progress—in keeping with the aging of the original targeted readers/viewership and the actors in the films—an agreeable one, not in the least because it expects its audience to grow with it, rather than simply offering more of the same.

This latest entry, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, boasts a new director, David Yates (known in the UK for his highly regarded TV series State of Play), a new screenwriter, Michael Goldenberg (who co-authored P.J. Hogan’s marvelous 2004 film of Peter Pan), and a new composer, Nicholas Cooper (who has worked with Yates on television). The results are certainly more than satisfactory, even if they don’t quite scale the heights of Cuaron’s Prisoner of Azkaban as filmmaking is concerned.

The infusion of new blood on all the major behind-the-camera players serves the film well. Order of the Phoenix is not only the darkest, most sinister (it comes very near to qualifying as a horror picture) and most mature of the films, it’s the most tightly structured. The series’ least appealing aspects—the broad humor involving Harry’s mortal family and the interminable Quidditch matches—have been respectively curtailed or dropped altogether. Apart from the easily identifiable theme, Cooper’s marvelous score jettisons most of John Williams’ music, adopting a grimmer, more menacing tone. This makes for a leaner—and undeniably meaner—film. There’s very little “precious” humor here—apart from the Weasley twins’ (James and Oliver Phelps) moneymaking scheme involving candy that deliberately makes one sick for purposes of getting out of classes. Some viewers may find this disappointing, but it’s certainly in keeping with the overall more serious tone. As a result, this really is not a film for very young viewers.

The screenplay and the direction convey a sense of urgency lacking in the earlier entries. As the overall saga moves toward its final installment, the stakes have risen accordingly. Although this was set up in Mike Newell’s Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005), it’s more and more a life or death situation in Order of the Phoenix. The film wastes no time getting underway, plunging the viewer into the proceedings—and the threat of the return of Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes)—within a couple minutes of the main title. And it works.

The story, of course, is simply a continuation of the overall series detailing the growth of its main character and the fantastic machinations that will finally pit him against the evil wizard, Voldemort, who murdered his parents. This round, Harry must face the fact that the head of the Ministry of Magic, Cornelius Fudge (Robert Hardy), has inaugurated a smear campaign against him and against Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) because the minister doesn’t believe—or doesn’t want to believe—their claims that Voldemort has returned. To this end, he has an accomplice, Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), who seems to have inherited Celia Imrie’s riot-of-pink wardrobe from Nanny McPhee (2005), making her the witch version of a Mary Kay saleswoman, I suppose. It’s an interesting comedic touch that only lends weight to her astonishing awfulness. Umbridge may not be the most lethal villain in the series to date, but she’s probably the most thoroughly detestable one!

Nearly all of the film works. Yates’ direction is very assured and his use of editing to heighten and inform many scenes is outstanding. There are numerous clever touches (viewers who know their theatre history will be amused to find that Alan Rickman’s Severus Snape has been awarded one of Sheridan Whiteside’s most famous lines from the play The Man Who Came to Dinner) and a stunner of a climax that’s probably the best ending on a Potter film yet. The weakest angle in the film involves Harry’s romance with Cho Chang (Katie Leung), which feels both perfunctory and too unresolved, but this is a minor quibble. As things stand, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is easily the best of the big summer movies. Rated PG-13 for sequences of fantasy violence and frightening images.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

  1. I found the romance to be pasted in as well. There are any number of left out subplots that might have been better suited to tell in the time period the Cho story takes up. I suppose it serves to place Harry’s age and build toward the sexual development that happens in the 6th episode, but really, there was either too little or too much time paid to this storyline to make it interesting in the movie.

  2. Ken Hanke

    Since two friends of mine — avowed Potterheads — saw the film the other night and were sorely disappointed not only by things that were left out (they have both worked in the industry and realize this is pretty inevitable), but be things that were re-written (in one case at least for no discernible reason), I thought I would reiterate that I’m approaching the series strictly on its own merits. I read the first book after seeing the movie and I read part of the second, but didn’t feel compelled to carry on. With this in mind, though, it’s possible that the film may disappoint other hardcore readers.

  3. blacks magee

    the movie was amazing. i am a diehard harry potter book fan, but i understand the differences and this was finally a proper harry potter film.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.