I Am Love

Movie Information

The Story: A middle-aged woman finds herself when she falls in love with her son's best friend. The Lowdown: A daringly honest, yet breathlessly and unabashedly operatic film that will not be to everyone's taste, but will dazzle and thrill viewers who are open to the experience it offers.
Genre: Drama
Director: Luca Guadagnino
Starring: Tilda Swinton, Flavio Parenti, Edoardo Gabbriellini, Alba Rohrwacher, Pippo Delbono, Marisa Berenson
Rated: R

An amazing, bold, sensuous, erotic and utterly operatic film blows into town this week. It’s called I Am Love and was made by a man named Luca Guadagnino, whom I’d never heard of before. For that matter, until the title cropped up on a booking sheet—quickly followed by the FedEx gentleman delivering a screener—I’d heard nothing about the film either. In fact, the only name associated with it I recognized was that of Tilda Swinton—and I hadn’t realized I’d be getting a Tilda Swinton speaking Italian with—we’re told—a Russian accent (like most of us could tell). So a film I wasn’t waiting for by a filmmaker I was unaware of just shows up and blows me away. I like that. It’s the kind of thing that makes this job worthwhile in a big way.

I Am Love has been likened to the films of Douglas Sirk and Luchino Visconti, and while I certainly understand why, the comparisons fall short for me—not in the least because Visconti never made a film I liked this much and Sirk never made a film I liked at all. The truth is that while I Am Love has more than its share of the operatic soap opera, it’s never condescending in tone, which removes it from the realm of Sirk. Visconti is more to the point, since I Am Love inescapably recalls The Leopard (1963) set in modern times.

I Am Love is several things at once. On the one hand, it’s the story of a woman, Emma Recchi (Swinton), discovering herself after years of being a kind of human collectible in the Recchi household—one of the art treasures her husband, Tancredi (Pippo Delbono), brought back from a trip to Russia. She has lived her adult life in his gorgeous museum-like art deco villa, bearing and bringing up his children, but with no actual personal role—until she finds one for herself in the form of her son Edoardo’s (Flavio Parenti) friend, Antonio (Edoardo Gabbriellini). At the same time, it’s a story about the passing of an era, with the nouveau-riche family’s textile business falling prey to modern times and the dying family patriarch (Gabriele Ferzetti, Once Upon a Time in the West) opting to leave everything in the hands of both Tancredi and Edoardo, who have very different ideas of what the business was, is and should be.

I’m not about to attempt to recount the plot beyond the basics mentioned. It seems simple enough, but it’s complicated by the personalities of the characters involved—and some of those personalities are left to the viewer’s interpretation. Why, for example, is Edoardo happy to not win a race, but to tie with Antonio? Why is Edoardo so anxious to be Antonio’s friend and start a business with him? Why is Edoardo so devastated when he learns of his mother’s affair with his friend? Of which one is he jealous? The film suggests answers, but it doesn’t hand them to you. Does Emma’s daughter, Elisabetta (Alba Rohrwacher)—who opts to come out to her mother about her lesbianism—play a role in Emma’s decision to find her true self—the one buried under years of Recchi tradition? Considering that Elisabetta has already gone against the family by changing her interest from painting to photography, I’d say yes, but the film only suggests.

I Am Love is a rare film in so many ways. It has a lyrical, natural, non-air-brushed sensuality to it that I haven’t seen in film since Ken Russell brought Women in Love to the screen in 1969. In fact, the love scenes appear to deliberately recall moments from that film and from Russell’s Savage Messiah (1972)—to the degree that I’d be hard-pressed to believe Guadagnino was unfamiliar with them. I Am Love is refreshingly real and honest—romantic without being romanticized. Then there’s the choice to use existing music by American composer John Adams (Nixon in China) rather than an original score. Guadagnino often lets the music—especially its breathless ending—drive the film’s action and emotionalism. The effect is phenomenal, but so is the film itself. See it. Rated R for sexuality and nudity.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “I Am Love

  1. Me

    I know critics have been going crazy over this film because there doesn’t seem to be any lasciviously epic dramas made any more but does it update the genre or bring anything new to the table? Is it simply just a revivalist film?

    Nothing about this film interests me in the least bit, im looking more forward to Swintons upcoming film We Need To Talk About Kevin.

  2. Ken Hanke

    but does it update the genre or bring anything new to the table? Is it simply just a revivalist film?

    I’d say it does bring something new to the table, but I’d also say that I don’t feel that it necessarily needs to. Does every film have to reinvent a genre? (If that even is a genre.)

    Nothing about this film interests me in the least bit

    That’s easily solved by not seeing it.

  3. Me

    “Nothing about this film interests me in the least bit.”

    Yeah but all the positive reviews make me wonder.

    Ken don’t you read any film blogs to keep up with whats coming out? It’s had a little bit of buzz for the last couple months.

  4. Ken Hanke

    Ken don’t you read any film blogs to keep up with whats coming out? It’s had a little bit of buzz for the last couple months.

    I spend as much time as I can, but it all depends on what you read. Also, you try to watch and review what generally runs between six and nine movies a week, write the Screening Room and the Weekly Reeler (add in dredging up, sizing and placing the photos for each), introducing and answering questions for two movies a week, and responding to the comments on the Xpress site and see if you keep track of everything that’s coming out.

  5. John Molly

    I saw the movie last night. Loved it. I love how Tilda Swinson’s character, Emma, goes from a grand mansion with no love, to no home (a cave in the final credits) where she is nothing but love, giving and receiving.

    Also brilliant in showing Emma’s transformation was the use of the gentleman who speaks english, of Indian decent, discussing business and money as he touches the Emma’s hand…he is completely foreign to her: visually, linguistically, culturally, philisophically…well done!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.