Movie Information

Naqoycatsi will be shown at the Asheville Art Museum at 2 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, May 10 and May 11.
Genre: Musical Abstraction
Director: Godfrey Reggio (Koyaanisqatsi)
Rated: PG

I confess straight off that I’m not a huge fan of nonnarrative film. Even the tritest, most hackneyed, old-fashioned nonsense strikes me as preferable to movies with no story at all. I haven’t a lot more patience with movies that try to make a point via a barrage of abstract images. It’s the sort of thing that strikes me as OK for an artsy short film, and it can work well within the confines of a narrative film—consider the “Star Ride” in Kubrick’s 2001 (1968) or the sequence that takes the viewer back to the very beginning of life in Ken Russell’s Altered States (1980). But a solid 90 minutes of stream-of-conscious imagery on any topic is likely to stretch my patience well beyond the breaking point. Such is the case with Godfrey Reggio’s Naqoycatsi, the title of which translates from the Hopi language as something like “war as life.”

This is the final third of his trilogy that began in 1983 with Koyaanisqatsi (“life out of balance”) and was followed in 1988 by Powaqquatsi (“life in transition”). The original film—with its fast-moving, time-lapse images of modern life—was a surprise hit that quickly became assimilated into mainstream cinema in bits and pieces. (Even today indie filmmakers do dearly love to stick a time-lapse shot of traffic streaking past into their films out of a fondness for art-house clichés.) I’m not saying that Koyaanisqatsi is bad; it’s merely not for me.

Technically, this latest is brilliant. The imagery is often mesmerizing—and even more often vaguely depressing (which seems to be the intent)—and its relationship to the Philip Glass score is ingeniously achieved. But in the end, for me, it’s just too much of a good thing being bombarded with an hour and a half of trippy images that appear to be lecturing me on how miserable, yet strangely beautiful, modern life is. Your mileage with this may vary, and I’d urge you to see it for yourself. What in this case I find mind-numbing may stike you as deeply profound. And I wouldn’t say you’re wrong if it does.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Naqoycatsi

  1. Sean Williams

    Mr. Hanke, you have achieved an internet milestone: not only is this review succinct and thoroughly detailed, it’s also your one thousand three hundred and thirty-seventh review on!

    That’s right: |<3|\| |5 73|-| 1337|\|355.

    It's a compliment. Trust me.

  2. Ken Hanke

    Thank you, I’ll take it as a compliment, even if the actual numerological import escapes me.

  3. Sean Williams

    In online terminology, “1337” is a graphical representation of the word “leet” — short for elite. It’s a term of veneration for particularly skillful hackers. Any coincidental occurrence of the number is regarded as an auspicious omen, a token of approval bestowed by the Internet Gods.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.