A Notebook on Cities and Clothes

Movie Information

Asheville Art Museum, 2 Pack Square South, will present A Notebook on Cities and Clothes on Saturday, Aug. 25, and Sunday, Aug. 26, at 2 p.m. Admission is $6 for adults, $5 for seniors and students, and free for museum members.
Genre: Documentary
Director: Wim Wenders
Starring: Yohji Yamamoto, Wim Wenders
Rated: NR

“We live in the cities. The cities live in us … time passes. We move from one city to another, we change languages, we change habits, we change opinions, we change clothes, we change everything. Everything changes. And fast. Images above all change faster and faster and they have been multiplying at a hellish rate ever since the explosion that released the electronic images—the very images that are now replacing photography.” So speaks filmmaker Wim Wenders in the meditation on identity that opens this ostensible documentary released in 1989 on fashion designer Yohji Yamamoto. I say “ostensible documentary” because Wenders is someone who can never do anything the simple way. Yes, this 81-minute film is a documentary on Yamamoto, but Wenders isn’t content to leave it there. In his broader view, A Notebook on Cities and Clothes is about considerably more than that. Wenders has insisted on using the documentary to explore the nature of identity—the identity foisted on us by our surroundings, our choice in clothing, our choice in what we watch.

More, he attempts to tackle the idea of two arts—fashion design and filmmaking—as works that are never completely in the control of the person who made them. In the case of fashion, for example, the clothes become the expression of the person wearing them—an expression apart from that of their creator. In the case of film, the images and the meaning become the property of the viewer—assimilated and interpreted apart from the filmmaker. The question arises as to how successful Wenders is in his aims. The answer, I believe, is that it doesn’t matter. The resulting film is, as its title asserts, a “notebook.” It’s less a polished, formal work than a series of personal musings on the topics being covered. Whether Wenders completely makes his cases is secondary. The film’s raison d’être is simply to pose the questions that it raises for the filmmaker—proving once again that art needn’t be conclusive. It simply needs to raise the “right” issues and questions with style.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.