When this ran back in 2007, I said it was “one of Bergman’s more flawed works. Of course, flawed Bergman is apt to be a lot more worthwhile than the best of many lesser filmmakers. That’s the case here — and for that matter, even some of Bergman’s flaws are not uninteresting. The single greatest drawback to The Passion isn’t Bergman’s insistence on breaking up the drama by inserting interviews with the four main actors (though the device only partly works). Rather, it’s the film’s strange narrative jump from Andreas Winkelman (Max von Sydow) having an affair with Eva Vergerus (Bibi Andersson) to living with Anna Fromm (Liv Ullmann). It just happens, leaving the film feeling like there’s a chunk missing. Knowing Bergman’s work, this is probably deliberate, and it does tie in to the fact that The Passion is an often inconclusive work — even to the extent that it contains an unresolved mystery element involving an apparent psycho who tortures and kills animals. The problem is that the jump doesn’t work.”
Full review here: http://www.mountainx.com/movies/review/passion_of_anna
A Passion, is one of my favorite Bergman films and it is too bad they titled it Passion of Anna in the US–because it is a film about all of our passions. Here is another persons review of the film from the UK
Author: Graham Greene from United Kingdom
This is without question one of Bergman’s greatest and most rewarding films, and indeed, one of his most subtle. Like his more iconic work – such as The Seventh Seal (1957), Wild Strawberries (1957), Persona (1966), Cries and Whispers (1971), etc – it presents a rich tapestry of wounded characters and painful memories that are affective on a completely external level. However, what elevates this from a great film to a work of unforgettable genius is in the questions that the film asks – but never answers – and in the window that it offers into the world of Bergman’s previous film, the surreal, anti-war parable Shame (1968).
Like many of his greatest films, A Passion (1969) looks at characters disconnected from the world in which they inhabit and slowly becoming disconnected from themselves within the process. There are the obvious parallels with Shame – which we will come back to – as well as Persona (1966) and Hour of the Wolf (1966). As with those films, A Passion has strong roots in existentialism; creating a barren landscape that comes to represent the internal psychological state of the characters and that particular sense of deep despair and quiet alienation that drives them to take solace in other, equally damaged souls. We also have a series of continual stylistic juxtapositions and attempts by Bergman to disarm and distract us. The most obvious of these is the use of the narration, which on our first exposure, seems to fulfil no real purpose, instead, merely jarring against the natural, almost-documentary like presentation of the film. Added to this, there is a subtle breakdown in reality happening with the notions of fact and fiction, which is again mirrored externally by the way in which Bergman breaks
the fourth-wall of the drama to offer us the opinions of his actors on the roles that they are about to perform.
The technique is reminiscent of Toshio Matsumoto’s equally compelling psychological examination, Funeral Parade of Roses (1969), only without the obvious kaleidoscopic influences of pop art, psychedelic rock and the spirit of Jean Luc Godard. It also suggests the confessional element of films like Hour of the Wolf, Scenes from a Marriage (1973) and Rite (1969), only in a way that is far more obtrusive. What these scenes represent for me at this exact point in time is somewhat unknown, although they certainly don’t feel out of place; especially within the context of that closing shot and the final revelation.
The plot here is a maze of pure emotions, with Bergman’s cold and clinical narration and ironic deconstruction of the narrative elements turning A Passion into an examination, with characters trapped in metaphorical glass jars and analysed by spectators in order to understand something, not necessarily about the characters, but very much about ourselves. Alongside these deconstructive elements we have characters that seemingly can’t be trusted with the information that they have to offer us, with lies, guilt and deceit all swirling ’round us like a whirlpool of blame, disappointment and critical self-examination. The characters are running away from things that there is no real escape from, and the relationship that seems to offer a further window out of their self-imposed exile and malaise ends up leading back again; leaving the characters broken more so than they were at the start of the film. Although it is done subtly by Bergman, the ending of the film is every bit as desolate and apocalyptic as the ending of Shame, or as deconstructive and subversive as the ending of Persona.
Alongside the creation of a setting that is barren and desolate, and the claustrophobic feeling created by the use of cramped interiors and a limited psychological space, Bergman also creates tension from the enigmatic quality of his characters and the questions that they
present. In one of the film’s most fascinating sub-plots, we discover that the animals on the island are being slaughtered by an unseen madman; an intelligent and disturbing idea that further suggests the notions of reality breaking down and the nightmarish thoughts and feelings of the characters spilling out and enveloping them. The identity of this violent and cruel individual remains a mystery throughout, with Bergman leaving us to draw our own conclusions; forcing the audience to question not only the actions and intentions of the character observing this horror, but also whether or not this same horror is merely an extension of the character’s crumbling world. This is further illustrated by a third-act dream sequence that not only contextualises the whole of A Passion – and, in particular, the character of Anna – but also the director’s previous film, Shame.
Without a doubt, this is raw and extremely powerful film-making; evident from Bergman’s uncomplicated use of editing and cinematography. As a result, the film looks and feels very much like an obvious precursor to Lars von
Trier’s later examination into human fragility, Breaking the Waves (1996), with the filmmaker shooting in muted colours with naturalistic lighting, minimal production design, choppy editing and the use of hand-held cameras. This, combined with the towering performance from Max Von Sydow as the central character Andreas Winkelman, and fine support from Bergman’s greatest collaborators, Liv Ullmann, Bibi Andersson and Erland Josephson, create something truly astounding and truly unforgettable.