Room

Movie Information

The Story: A woman held captive for seven years and her five-year-old son escape to the outside world and try to adapt. The Lowdown: Highly-acclaimed — and admittedly unusual — tale that doesn't live up to its premise or its reception. Others will disagree with that assessment.
Score:

Genre: Drama
Director: Lenny Abrahamson (Frank)
Starring: Brie Larson, Jacob Tremblay, Joan Allen, Tom McCamus, Sean Bridgers, William H. Macy
Rated: R

untitled

 

I am supposed to absolutely love Lenny Abrahamson’s Roomthe high-concept art film of the year. I am supposed to be moved and … well, shattered by the experience. I am also prepared for some hardcore vilification because I am not. Truthfully, the best I got out of it was intermittent admiration — which was also my response to Abrahamson’s last film, Frank (2014), though I liked it better. Room is not a film to “like” — though some seem to find it “heartwarming.” This is more in the realm of cinematic “nasty medicine that is good for you,” redeemed in part by one nicely sustained (if not wholly believable) suspense sequence in the middle of the film. Room isn’t a bad film, but neither do I believe it’s the deep-dish masterpiece it’s been painted as.

 

960

 

The story — adapted by Emma Donoghue from her novel — concerns a young woman named Joy Newsom (mostly called “Ma,” and played by Brie Larson), who was kidnapped at age 17 and imprisoned in the title room by a man she calls Old Nick (Sean Bridgers, Dark Places). Two years into her ordeal, she bore her captor a son, Jack (Jacob Tremblay), who is celebrating his fifth birthday when the film opens. Since the story (at least in the book) is entirely from Jack’s point of view, the background of it all is something we have to pick up along the way. In an effort — however misguided — to give the boy some sense of a normal life, she has convinced him that “Room” is all there is. To him, this cramped garden shed — configured with heat, a bathroom, a TV and a kind of kitchen — is the world. It’s all he knows and all she’s allowed him to know. But, now that he’s five, Ma decides he’s old enough to know the truth (something he is resistant to learning) and to help in securing their escape (something he is unprepared for). Both things are certainly understandable in a child of five.

 

room-1024

 

That roughly forms the first half of the movie, leading us to the film’s most successfully sustained sequence (the escape), followed by the depiction of the attempts to adjust to the real world, which is the mostly the least successful aspect of the film. None of this qualifies for spoilers, since all of this is clearly established in the trailers and the publicity for the film. Abrahamson and the author are more assured when the story is confined to the confines of the room, though your involvement in it may depend on your tolerance for the high-pitched screaming of a five-year-old. I confess mine is limited, which is probably a character flaw on my part.

 

16ROOM-superJumbo

 

Once the film moves into the world beyond “Room,” it’s not only Jack who is at a loss of what to make of it all, so are the filmmakers. It starts off reasonably well, but quickly becomes unfocused. Characters appear and disappear. Why is Grandma’s (Joan Allen) second husband (Tom McCamus) the most human and functioning character in the movie? Plot points are raised and quickly dropped — or possibly just forgotten about. Some of this — like the fate of Old Nick, and Joy’s father’s (William H. Macy) just vanishing over his inability to cope with the history of Jack’s conception and birth — may be excused as some kind of subtlety. Where this subtlety was in Joy’s reaction to a TV interviewer and the haircut symbolism (you’ll know) is another matter. So much feels like it exists only to get to an ending that’s perhaps more simplistic (and dubious) than ambiguous.

 

la-et-mn-tiff-brie-larson-room-20150915

 

Worst of all, the real-world aspect is curiously flat and lacking in style. It mostly looks like a stale TV drama taking place on sets left over from a 1970s sitcom. It’s not bad exactly. It’s more just indifferent, which may be worse. But bear in mind, my reservations and tepid response to Room are very much in the minority. Rated R for Language.

 

 

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

15 thoughts on “Room

  1. donathan_white

    I am confused by the first paragraph. Did you mean to say that you like Room more than Frank or the other way around? I tried to find your Frank review, but it is not on the xpress website. Did you not officially review it?

        • Edwin Arnaudin

          Same here, though I don’t think either live up to their premises’ potential.

          • Ken Hanke

            Was there much? I missed it, but you hang out on websites I don’t.

          • Me

            I think it was more of a small film people were trying to champion.

          • Me

            You might actually like it, the film was based on a real guy, but I just didn’t find him very interesting or the genius everybody in the film thinks he is.

          • Edwin Arnaudin

            …What makes you think Ken hasn’t seen it?

  2. Me

    “But I did like it better than Room.”

    Never mind, dumb me I didn’t see this.

  3. I only got the chance to watch this now and I, once again, agree with you. It’s the kind of film you know a bunch of friends will crucify you if you say you didn’t love it. Well, my friends can prepare their nails and the cross, but they will not take without a fight!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.