Stop-Loss

Movie Information

The Story: A soldier returns home from Iraq with eyes on getting out of the military, only to find out he's being forced to return to war due to a lack of troops. The Lowdown: A film that attempts to take a more personal look at the war in Iraq, but remains too slight and contrived to be as important as it would like to be.
Score:

Genre: Iraq War Drama
Director: Kimberly Peirce
Starring: Ryan Phillippe, Channing Tatum, Abbie Cornish, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Timothy Olyphant
Rated: R

The aisles of multiplexes have of late been littered with box-office duds focusing on the Iraq war. Take last year’s Lions for Lambs, Rendition, In the Valley of Elah and Brian De Palma’s Redacted, which never even came to town. Kimberly Peirce’s Stop-Loss tries to buck that trend by aiming squarely for an MTV audience (the cable channel even produced the film), while never taking a completely firm stance on the war itself. Judging by the movie’s eighth-place finish in this past weekend’s box office, it doesn’t seem much has changed.

The term “stop-loss” refers to the military’s practice of forcing soldiers back to war after their tour of duty has ended, and Peirce uses this as a framework to examine how the war affects the soldiers themselves, eschewing any greater political message. The film follows Brandon (Ryan Phillippe), a soldier who has just returned home after finishing what was to be his final tour in Iraq before immediately being stop-lossed. Brandon still holds some guilt for leading his men into an ambush where some were killed or disfigured and civilians died. Instead of returning to Iraq, he somehow—off camera, mind you—sneaks off a military base and goes AWOL. The film then turns into a sort of implausible road-trip movie, in which Brandon leaves his native Texas in an attempt to make it to Washington, D.C., to speak with his local senator (Josef Sommer, The Invasion).

All of this is meant to study the soldiers, not just their reactions to being in combat, but also their sense of duty and honor. The movie is less about the war and more a criticism on the practices of the military. Peirce is obviously making a movie about the troops, while attempting to avoid stating whether or not she’s for or against the war. Sure, there are a number of criticisms leveled against the administration, along with the requisite “horrors of war” (every character suffers from some sort of post-traumatic stress disorder). But this is all negated in the film’s final scene and by the jingoistic mentality of many of the film’s characters—such as the “bomb them back into the Stone Age” attitude of Brandon’s best friend and fellow soldier, Steve (Channing Tatum, Step Up).

The idea of making a thoughtful film where both sides of the war are shown, while ultimately leaving the movie’s message up to the viewer, is perfectly fine in theory. But in the case of Stop-Loss, it doesn’t work in practice. The film’s basic structure is problematic. It never seems to know where it wants to go, literally meandering about the country as Brandon and Steve’s girlfriend, Michelle (Abbie Cornish, Elizabeth: The Golden Age), drive from Texas to Tennessee, halfway back to Texas, up to New York City and then back to Texas, all in what appears to be the span of a few days. Then there are the contrivances the film is built around, like a scuffle between Brandon and some thugs that’s simply there to once again remind the audience that Brandon hasn’t been quite right since after the war. Or take Brandon’s chance encounter with a fellow soldier who just happens to be AWOL in the exact same hotel in the middle of nowhere.

Despite all of this, the film might have worked if there had been a cast member who could have carried the film, but the performances range from the middling to the borderline embarrassing, complete with fake Texas accents (the kind that make James Van Der Beek’s in Varsity Blues (1999) sound authentic) serving as nothing more than a distraction. Anyone waiting for a movie to kick the moviegoing public out of their malaise surrounding the war is going to have to wait a little bit longer. Stop-Loss doesn’t appear to be it. Rated R for graphic violence and pervasive language.

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

25 thoughts on “Stop-Loss

  1. It’s interesting to note that this is Kimberly Pierce’s first film after the powerful BOYS DON’T CRY, which I believe came out in 1999. I still want to see it, but the film might have gotten muddled by MTV and endless focus groups.

  2. Justin Souther

    I can’t seem to find any reason why there is that nine year gap in between films. I’d be curious to know why, but I can’t seem to find any info on what she was up to between films, other than an episode of THE L WORD and an attempted adaptation of Dave Eggers’ A HEARTBREAKING WORK OF STAGGERING GENIUS that was announced four-and-a-half years ago and — I assume — fell through.

    It’s also hard to say how MTV-ized the movie is, though I’d have to say the on screen talent is about on par with their usual fare — not to mention the beefcake factor. But I think the thing that’s most glaring — or at least obnoxious — in an MTV kind of way is the movie’s terrible, abominable soundtrack.

  3. Ken Hanke

    I haven’t seen this — and may not — even though the whole topic of the anti-war film and its rough reception recently fascinates me (not sure this quite quaifies), especially since there’s apparently less and less public support for the war in question.

    Aside from that, you know, there’s really no reason the onscreen talent should have necessarily been a factor. The star of perhaps the greatest of all anti-war movies, ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT (1930), was 21 when the movie was started. (Legend has it that that his parents had to sign his contract for him, being only 20 when he was given the role.) And Ayres is perfect for his role and actually close to the right age for the character. Plus, in 1930 terms he’d probably qualify as beefcake. OK, so Ryan Philippe and Channing Tatum (who named this guy?) are pretty vapid in general, but Joseph Gordon-Levitt isn’t.

  4. Justin Souther

    “…Joseph Gordon-Levitt isn’t.”

    That may be true, but he’s never given anything to do in the film other than act sullen.

  5. Ken Hanke

    But in a way that in itself suggests that there’s a lot more wrong here than just the MTV-centric casting. That’s not to say that I don’t find the casting off-putting.

  6. Justin Souther

    “But in a way that in itself suggests that there’s a lot more wrong here than just the MTV-centric casting.”

    That’s obvious, but it certainly doesn’t help things.

  7. Ken Hanke

    Did I say it did? (We could keep this up all night if one of us doesn’t go to bed.)

  8. Justin Souther

    I’m sure watching stuff like SUPERHERO MOVIE and COLLEGE ROAD TRIP is putting me on the fast track.

  9. Ken Hanke

    I offered to review SUPERHERO MOVIE — and I have a witness to back me up. Next thing I know you’ll be blaming your hernia on these movies.

  10. Justin Souther

    We can compare health problems to number of bad movies watched and see what comes up.

  11. Ken Hanke

    I’m something like 28 years older than you. I’ll win — both in health problems and in numbers of bad movies seen.

  12. Justin Souther

    I think that’s called a “correlation.” Not being older but the other stuff.

  13. Ken Hanke

    I’m still trying to figure out whether or not bad movies can contribute to a hernia. In that I’ve never seen you lift anything heavier than a bag of take-out food, I admit there’s some evidence for the bad movie theory.

  14. Justin Souther

    “In that I’ve never seen you lift anything heavier than a bag of take-out food…”

    I didn’t realize you were Charles Atlas.

  15. Ken Hanke

    “This sounds like a job for Molton.”

    If — and only if — I am depicted as wrestling poodles and winning. (Bonzo Dog Band fans will get it.)

  16. Ken Hanke

    Ah, Mr. Bugg, I didn’t see you sneak in. Now, you are one of the few people I thought might get the Bonzo Dog Band reference.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.