Local man shoots and scores with Supreme Court gun ruling

Living in a gated community, Asheville resident Robert Levy doesn’t own a gun because he doesn’t feel he needs one. Others are not so lucky, he says, especially those who live on the mean streets of places such as Washington, D.C., Levy’s hometown.

But thanks largely to Levy’s efforts, citizens of the nation’s capital will now be able to own a handgun, following a decades-long ban in the city (see “Arms and the Man,” May 28 Xpress).

Levy is a key player behind the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court decision on June 26 in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. The landmark ruling not only lifted the ban but also, for the first time, stated unequivocally that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to bear arms. The ruling also stated that such individual rights are not absolute: “It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose,” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority.

Levy was the lawyer who brought and tried the case nearly five years ago, and personally funded it as it wended its way to the Supreme Court. Though he thinks the ruling is not perfect, Levy tells Xpress, he and his co-counsels are pleased.

“The court certainly found we were correct in suggesting that the Second Amendment secured an individual right, and that D.C.‘s gun ban could not be considered constitutional in light of that individual right,” he says. “The court didn’t go quite as far as we would have liked in elaborating on the standard of review, the level of scrutiny, that would apply when examining other gun regulations. It left that issue pretty much unresolved, and it’s going to take a good deal more litigation to flesh that out. We would have preferred if the court had stated it would ‘strictly scrutinize’ all gun regulations.”

Levy, who was present when the ruling was read from the bench, described the day as one full of drama. “It was gut-wrenching,” he says. “There was mayhem outside the court with various demonstrators and press conferences; and, for the next two days I had nonstop, wall-to-wall media commitments. So it was an exciting time.”

In response to the resulting outcry from gun-control proponents, Levy says, “This was all about self-defense. It was about letting law-abiding citizens have ordinary, garden-variety handguns in their home, to be able to defend themselves in a city where violence is not unknown. We’re not talking about carrying assault weapons on city streets. We’re talking about the very basic elements of self-defense. Washington, D.C., is a terrifically violent community, as are many cities across the nation that have very restrictive gun laws. That denies to citizens a very fundamental right, and at least in Washington, D.C., that’s been rectified.”

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Local man shoots and scores with Supreme Court gun ruling

  1. XD Owner

    It is not correct to say that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to firearms. The Second Amendment acknowledges a pre-existing right to firearms. The phrase “shall not be infringed” presupposes an existing right. Too bad the Brady’s never seemed to understand that.

  2. AshevilleObserver

    Is Mountain Express the only local news outlet to pick up on Robert Levy’s connection to Asheville in conjunction with this important story? Did Citizen-Times miss it?

  3. Hal Millard

    I haven’t done a comprehensive search on the AC-T’s Web site, or any other local news outlets, but I’ve seen no other local reference to Levy other than what I wrote for Xpress. If I’m mistaken, I’d welcome correction from any news outlet locally that has referred to or spoken with Mr. Levy.

Leave a Reply to Hal Millard ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.