$51M in federal COVID relief on way to Buncombe

Money and flag
THANKS, UNCLE SAM: Buncombe County is slated to receive over $51 million from the federal American Rescue Plan, a relief package meant to encourage economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Photo by Getty Images

For all of Buncombe County’s dire projections at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, its government is currently in healthy financial shape: Fiscal year 2019-20 revenues came in $2 million over budget, and instead of spending a projected $15 million in fund balance, the county actually increased its coffers by $2.5 million. Thanks to a new federal pandemic relief bill, that picture of health is about to get even brighter — over $51 million brighter.

As explained by Rachael Nygaard, Buncombe’s strategic partnerships director, during a March 16 meeting of the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners, the money comes from the recently passed American Rescue Plan, which includes over $65 billion in direct aid to counties across the country. Because the funds are meant to encourage general recovery from the pandemic instead of just responding to its immediate threat, she said, local governments will have substantial spending leeway.

Like a $7.9 million federal grant Buncombe received in February, the new money could be used for direct assistance to households that have been financially harmed by the pandemic. But it could also go toward extra pay for essential workers or investments in water, sewer and broadband infrastructure. “We have some more flexibility to use funds to address the economic impacts of COVID-19, rather than just direct COVID-19 response to the public health emergency,” Nygaard said.

The funds, equal to roughly a quarter of Buncombe’s budgeted property tax revenue for the current fiscal year and more than its budgeted spending on general government administration, represent by far the largest pot of federal support yet provided to the county during the pandemic. Brownie Newman, the county board’s Democratic chair, said he was excited by how the aid might further projects that had long been delayed due to lack of money.

“It’s very significant,” Newman said. “I’ve been in local government for a long time, and it’s pretty unprecedented, in terms of just the level of resources.”

Commissioners will likely schedule a dedicated work session and opportunities for public input on the use of the funds over the next 60-90 days before setting formal spending plans. According to federal law, all of the money must be used by the end of 2024.

In other news

The first reading of a proposed county nondiscrimination ordinance drew several commenters supporting the measure and no speakers in opposition. Those backing the language included Asheville City Council member Kim Roney, Chair Judy Maddox of the Western North Carolina Sierra Club and Tina White, executive director of Blue Ridge Pride.

“Because there were no laws like this ordinance, nor leaders like you, I could never assume safety outside my home,” said White, a transgender woman, regarding her experience after transitioning several years ago. “You too would live in fear if you could not take it for granted that the people and institutions in power were committed to protecting your ability to live.”

And Commissioner Parker Sloan, a Democrat, suggested strengthening the civil penalties for violation of the ordinance from the currently proposed $100-per-day fine. Instead, he advocated for a graduated approach that would levy a fine of $250 for the second offense and $500 for the third and subsequent offenses within a calendar year, levels he said were in line with those of other county ordinances.

Sloan’s colleagues did not share their opinions on his proposal during the meeting. The board is scheduled to further discuss the ordinance on Tuesday, April 6, and may take a vote on the matter then.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Daniel Walton
Daniel Walton is the former news editor of Mountain Xpress. His work has also appeared in Sierra, The Guardian, and Civil Eats, among other national and regional publications. Follow me @DanielWWalton

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “$51M in federal COVID relief on way to Buncombe

  1. C-Law

    Every cent of it should go to direct reparations payments for “Black” residents. Anything less just proves the inherent racism and hypocrisy of the local politicians. And the funds should go toward the demolition and utter destruction of the Vance phallic symbol spewing forth its putrid hatred right in the middle of our beloved downtown district.

    Come on Commission, put the money where your political posturing and virtue signalling mouths are!

  2. Xiden lost, we all know it.

    Better call Wanda Greene’s travel agent to book some meetings at a hotel on the beach at some exotic location to discuss how to spend it, first class of course…

  3. luther blissett

    The budgetary choice with the broadest benefit for “general recovery” would be to make the property tax rates for 2021 revenue-neutral. It’s that simple.

    One of the biggest local economic impacts of Covid-19 has been the craziness in the real estate market, and while the county might be popping champagne corks over the numbers from the recent reassessment, keeping the same ad valorem rate would potentially cost lower-end homeowners with mortgages an extra $100 or $200 a month to catch up right at the point where things might be getting back to (a new) normal. A revenue-neutral year would serve as a shock absorber.

    The county can’t plead poverty. It can revisit things in 2022 when there’s a better sense of where the local economy stands.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.