Buncombe plans hiring push for next fiscal year

Buncombe budget work session
EXPANDING THE CIRCLE: The Buncombe County Board of Commissioners discusses potential staffing increases during a March 29 budget work session. Photo by Daniel Walton

If Buncombe County’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was all hands on deck, its plan for the 2022-23 fiscal year is many more hands on deck.

As presented to the Buncombe Board of Commissioners during a March 29 work session, County Manager Avril Pinder hopes to expand her current staff of over 1,600 employees by more than 70 in the next budget cycle, which starts in July. Most of those workers won’t be used to establish new county functions, she explained, but would instead bolster existing services.

By comparison, Buncombe added just 11 new employees supported by general tax revenue in the fiscal year 2020-21 budget, a constrained move that Pinder attributed at the time to worries over the coronavirus’s economic impact. The 2021-22 budget added 27 new positions.

“We’re going back to our foundational departments. We have not funded them the way [they] should have been funded in the past,” Pinder said March 29. “The pandemic has really exposed to us the gaps that we have in service that we’re not providing. And staff is burned out.”

The new staffers would be spread over a range of county departments at an estimated annual cost of $6.1 million. The single biggest increase would be 14 positions in Emergency Services, including eight paramedics to support a new ambulance.

Other proposed additions include five workers to improve the county’s 911 operations, five human resources staffers to boost recruitment and retention, five library employees and five Sheriff’s Office positions. Buncombe’s Planning Department would get four new staffers to support implementation of the impending Comprehensive Plan 2043, while two additional hires would round out the county’s diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

Brownie Newman, the Buncombe board’s chair, noted that the proposed growth in county government staffing significantly exceeded the county’s annual population growth rate of around 1%. He said such increases wouldn’t be sustainable on a regular basis but agreed with Pinder that the county needed to adjust its workforce in line with community demands.

“Our past history has finally caught up with us, because we’ve been holding those numbers down,” added Commissioner Al Whitesides. “But now that we’re getting to this point … hopefully it will level off and it’ll just be normal. We won’t have as many [new positions] every year.”

The county also estimates additional spending on its existing employees. Workers would see a raise of nearly 4.7% to cover cost-of-living increases, more than double the 1.9% increase approved in the 2021-22 budget, at a cost of about $5.7 million. Pinder noted that further pay increases could be proposed in April pending the results of a county salary study.

Buncombe’s next budget work session is scheduled for Tuesday, April 26. Local school systems and fire districts will present their requests Tuesday, May 10, and Thursday, May 19, Pinder will present her recommended budget.

A public hearing on the budget is scheduled for Tuesday, June 7. The Board of Commissioners will then vote to approve a final budget at their regular meeting Tuesday, June 21.

In other news

A new program designed to provide property tax relief to Buncombe homeowners distributed nearly $480,000 in aid to 1,263 households last year, according to a March 29 presentation by Phillip Hardin, the county’s economic services director. But administering the Homeowner Grant Program cost taxpayers an estimated $208,000 — about 30% of total spending on the effort.

That ratio far exceeds allowable administrative spending for other programs managed by the county. For example, rental assistance made available through federal COVID-19 relief funds  must cap administrative costs at just 10%-15%. The state of North Carolina set a 5% cap for administrative costs on rent relief funds it provided to counties in 2021.

“This was my biggest concern. … That’s a big burn rate on admin for the actual public benefit we’re able to provide for it,” said Newman. “I would really love to see [the program] continue going, but to me, it’d be hard to justify that much cost to the taxpayers when the goal here is to help the taxpayers.”

Hardin also noted that much of the Homeowner Grant Program funding went to households with significant financial reserves. At least 518 recipients had reserves of $5,000 or more; at least 157 recipients, or more than 12% of the total, had at least $50,000 in excess resources.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Daniel Walton
Daniel Walton is the News Editor of Mountain Xpress, coordinating coverage of Western North Carolina's governments, community groups, businesses and environment. His work has previously appeared in Capital at Play, Edible Asheville and the Citizen-Times, among other area publications. Follow me @DanielWWalton

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Buncombe plans hiring push for next fiscal year

  1. Rwd

    I want to make sure I have an accurate understanding of what has been written in the last paragraph.
    1. What does $5,000.00 in reserves actually mean ? Is that an amount in cash, in a bank or savings account, in stocks or bonds, in retirement savings plans ?
    2. The same question for $50,000.00 in excess resources.
    There is another question regarding the administrative cost…either there were many people doing this task or fewer people using a lot of time doing this task ? $50,000.00 in resources has a funny ring to it so what were these staffers actually doing ?
    Depending on explanations to these questions, I might need to find this office and submit my own forms for property tax relief !!

    • If I understood Hardin correctly, the reserves/excess resources refer to financial assets that can be easily converted into cash. While he didn’t go into a lot of detail, I think that includes bank accounts, investments, and other “liquid” assets.

      Similar, it’s not clear how many people were involved in administering the program, but the bulk of their time was spend determining applicant eligibility. Hope this helps!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.