City Council to study three sites for affordable housing bond funding

Asheville City Hall. Photo by Virginia Daffron

Over 70 percent of Asheville voters approved the city’s $25 million affordable housing bond referendum this past November. According to the city’s website for bond-related information, $10 million is earmarked for beefing up the Affordable Housing Trust Fund, which provides low-interest loans to developers who commit to building new affordable housing. The rest of the money — $15 million — is designated as funding to repurpose city land for affordable housing. The website specifies, “Primary project: South Charlotte Street corridor.”

In its first session dedicated solely to planning for spending $74 million in bond funding — which also includes $32 million for transportation infrastructure and $17 million for parks and recreation — City Council agreed with a plan advanced by Assistant City Manager Cathy Ball to consider two other properties alongside the 7.5-acre South Charlotte Street site for developing affordable housing.

One of the properties, 319 Biltmore Ave. (the former location of Matthews Ford), is owned by Duke Energy. City Council agreed last April to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Duke Energy for the 5.5-acre parcel. The agreement gives the city the option to purchase the land for $5.3 million, the same price Duke paid for it, for a period of eight years. The property sits next to the Lee Walker Heights public housing neighborhood, which the Housing Authority of the City of Asheville hopes to redevelop in partnership with Mountain Housing Opportunities.

The third site, located at 81 and 91 Riverside Drive, occupies about two acres. Developing that site, remarked Council member Gordon Smith, would address some of the issues identified by the city’s 2014 Alternatives to Gentrification in East of the Riverway study by providing affordable housing for artists working in the River Arts District.

The proposed studies will take about a year, Ball told Council, and will include environmental assessments, appraisals, surveys, conceptual design to determine the number of housing units each site could support, geotechnical analysis and an assessment of how developing each site would align with City Council’s strategic policy goals.

Responding to a question from Council member Cecil Bothwell, Ball said consultants would be used to complete the studies and a cost will be associated with the work. Bothwell urged Ball to consider the remaining useful life of city departments now located on the site. The Public Works operation, located south of Beaumont Street, houses garbage trucks and other equipment and has another 20 years of useful life, Ball said. The city’s Fleet Management operation, located between the Public Works garage and the ABC store, she said, has exceeded its useful life and no longer accommodates the city’s needs efficiently.

Contamination is a concern at the South Charlotte Street site, Ball continued, but it isn’t necessarily a deal breaker. Grants or other funding might be available to defray the cost of cleanup, she said, and addressing the contamination could benefit the health of the stream that runs beneath the property. “There are issues, and we’ve known of those issues, but it could be an opportunity,” she said.

Ball also gave an overview of an interim Capital Projects team, which will be led by Jade Dundas, the director of the Asheville Water Resources Department. The interim team will move planning and communication forward while the city recruits and hires a dedicated staff to oversee bond-related and Capital Improvement Plan projects, Ball said.

At its next regular meeting on Feb. 14, City Council will vote on budget amendments that incorporate around $200,000 of the grant money into the current fiscal year’s budget and acknowledge that the city will spend the total bond proceeds of $74 million over the next seven years. On April 17, Council will hold its next budget work session.



Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Virginia Daffron
Managing editor, lover of mountains, native of WNC. Follow me @virginiadaffron

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “City Council to study three sites for affordable housing bond funding

  1. Lulz

    This is what kills me about it. Wouldn’t it have already been done before even bringing up the bond issue. And now we get to spend even more money of the garage is taken out on South Charlotte. After all, it’s also going to need a new locale. Again, there’s logic and there’s stupidity. And the latter applies to those that voted for this farce.

  2. gail

    It wasn’t that many years ago that the taxpayers was asked to pay for a new garage and after it was built people were laughing at the size and the over-the-top architecture. Asheville residents were calling it the Taj Garage. It could not be possible that this garage is useless in such a short period of time. I have seen houses that were build 100 years ago and when taken care of are just as beautiful today. Asheville City Council is apparently very excited about how they can “waste” our taxpayer dollars. By the way, that small amount we were suppose to see on our property taxes was just increased due to the reevaluation of our property. Mine went up $25,000 dollars from one year to the next. Huh! That worked out well for our local politicians. Maybe this is just their way to push us lower income people out of the city to make room for the rich tourist coming in and taking over.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.