City Council to take fresh look at downtown development

The roof of Asheville City Hall.

With four cranes silhouetted against the skyline, construction fencing blocking sidewalks and hundreds of construction workers on the job every day, downtown Asheville is buzzing with development activity. As the city continues to garner attention as a tourism destination, and to post ever-higher numbers of annual visitors, commercial developers keep dreaming up schemes for new hotels, apartments and mixed-use buildings in the hot downtown market.

Of the 19 new building projects that have received building permits in the downtown area since 2010, however, only three have been reviewed by City Council. Amid concerns by downtown business owners and Asheville residents that new development may have gotten out of hand, Councilman Gordon Smith recently called for a fresh look at the project review guidelines in place since Council adopted the Downtown Master Plan in 2009.

As a report from new city planning director Todd Okolichany explains, Council presently only reviews development applications classified as Level III projects: buildings larger than 175,000 square feet or with a building height above the intermediate height zone (from 145 feet to a maximum of 265 feet). The projects which have met these criteria in recent years include the life safety tower for the Buncombe County Courthouse at 60 Court Plaza (2010), the Buncombe County Courts Building Amendment at 60 Court Plaza (2011) and the Buncombe County Health and Human Services Building at 40 Coxe Ave. (2015). Council will hear a conditional zoning request related to the redevelopment of the BB&T building at One West Pack Square in January 2016.

Downtown development permits for projects reaching Level II and higher thresholds since 2010. Image provided by planning department, City of Asheville
Downtown development permits for projects reaching Level II and higher thresholds since 2010. Image provided by planning department, City of Asheville

At Council’s regular meeting on Dec. 8, Okolichany will present the results of an analysis his department has prepared in response to Council’s request to re-examine the standards that govern downtown development. Okolichany’s report details the standards currently in place and potential alternative strategies for expanding Council review of downtown projects, as well as other strategies to maintain downtown’s unique character.

I-26 Connector Project

City transportation department director Ken Putnam and transportation staff will present a review of the process undertaken by the city in conjunction with the NCDOT’s release of the I-26 Connector Project Draft Environment Impact Statement and the NCDOT’s associated public comment period.

Putnam will present comments the city plans to submit to the NCDOT prior to the end of the public comment period on Dec. 16. Included within the city’s comments are recommendations such as:

  • re-assessing the project’s travel demand projections and minimizing the number of lanes necessary to meet those demands to the greatest extent possible
  • maintaining Amboy Road as a two-lane roadway (rather than the four lanes suggested by project plans)
  • increasing the pedestrian and bicycle amenities on the Haywood Road Bridge
  • reconsideration of the proposed closure of Hanover Street at its intersection with Haywood Road to avoid negative impacts to city bus routes W1 and W2, which provide service to the Pisgah View Apartments
  • specific recommendations for connections to city-owned greenways
  • attention to the adverse impacts on the Westgate Shopping Center and the Burton Street community associated with design alternatives 3 and 3C
  • concentrating funding within Section B of the project area (which includes the Jeff Bowen Bridge and I-240 near downtown) rather than Section C (which includes I-40 and I-26 to the south of Asheville)

Putnam also will put forward a resolution containing many of the recommendations noted above for City Council’s consideration and vote.

Mountain Xpress coverage of the latest design alternatives for the I-26 Connector Project, and the public comment process surrounding the project, can be found here:

Public Hearings

Council will hear public comment on two matters:

  • An amendment to a previously approved conditional zoning at 671 Sand Hill Road to add a two-story, 8,000 square foot building for an established private school, The New Classical Academy.
  • Consideration of the permanent closing of an unnamed alley off Jarrett Street.

Consent Agenda

Within the Consent Agenda (which is generally approved on a single vote of Council, with any items requiring additional discussion pulled out for separate review and voting), several items merit mention.

Council will vote to approve its meeting schedule for 2016, meeting on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month at 5 p.m. at City Hall, with the exception of the following dates (on which meetings will not be held): July 12, Aug. 9, Nov. 22 and Dec. 27.

The appointment of Council members to boards and commissions has been determined, with new Council members taking on the following assignments:

Brian Haynes: Civic Center Commission (liaison), Downtown Commission, Firemen’s Local Relief Fund (liaison), Planning & Economic Development Committee, Public Art & Cultural Commission (liaison), Public Safety Committee

Julie Mayfield: Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (liaison), Finance Committee, French Broad River MPO, Historic Resources Commission (liaison), Housing Authority (liaison), Housing & Community Development Committee, HUB Economic Community Development Alliance Board (alternate), Planning & Zoning Commission (liaison), Public Safety Committee, Soil Erosion/Stormwater Review Committee (liaison), Sustainability Advisory Committee on Energy and the Environment (liaison), Tourism Development Authority (ex-officio member, non-voting), WNC Regional Air Quality Agency Board (liaison)

Keith Young: Board of Adjustment (liaison), Boards & Commissions Committee, Citizens/Police Advisory Committee (ex-officio member, non-voting), Community Relations Council, Governance Committee, Recreation Board

The full listing of city boards and commissions, with Council representation and liaisons, can be found here.

As part of the consent agenda, Council will also vote on a resolution in support of the Connect NC bond act. The bond package includes $5 million which, if approved, will fund infrastructure repairs and deferred maintenance projects at Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College.

Board and Commission vacancies

The city has announced vacancies on the following boards and commissions: Affordable Housing Advisory Committee; Board of Adjustment; Community Relations Council; Downtown Commission; Energy & the Environment; Firemen’s Relief Fund; Homeless Initiative Advisory Committee; HUB Community Economic Development Alliance Board; Metropolitan Sewerage District Board; Riverfront Redevelopment Commission (design professional); and Tree Commission.

The deadline to apply for these openings is Wednesday, January 6, 2016, at 5:00 p.m. Call 259-5601 for an application form.


City Council meetings begin at 5 p.m. in Council Chambers at City Hall. The full agenda for the Dec. 8 meeting of Council, along with links to supporting documents, can be found here.


See also:

St. Lawrence Green supporters plan Council appearance




Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Virginia Daffron
Managing editor, lover of mountains, native of WNC. Follow me @virginiadaffron

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

16 thoughts on “City Council to take fresh look at downtown development

  1. “Gordon Smith recently called for a fresh look ”

    Oh. This is surprising. I thought ten years of progressivism perhaps would not need to take a fresh look.

    • Lulz

      LOL, the so called progressives are nothing more than a bunch of power hungry thieves who steal money from the taxpayers and give it away to their crony friends lulz. You too can make six figures a year by simply opening up a non-profit that benefits them in some way and have it made. Hate white working class guys? You can win here. Hate greenhouse gasses? Bank money. Pretend to care about women’s issues? LOL, put a ribbon on your lapel and stick your hand out LOL. Love tourism? Why just join a certain non profit where you can collect hundreds of thousands to spend as you see fit lulz. Tax free of course.

  2. VladEmrick

    I find it funny that people are whining about construction cranes and development downtown, when (a) at least two of the largest projects are associated with non-profits (the Eagle Street project and the expansion of the county’s offices on Coxe Avenue), and (b) the other projects will all increase the city’s tax base, and we know how these progressives on council love spending money.

  3. Yep

    Only in Ashevil would elected ‘LEADERS’ complain and question too much development.

  4. AVL LVR

    Asheville needs at least 8 lanes (perhaps 10) where I-26 and I-240 merge. It is logical to need more lanes to accommodate both highways. Why spend all that $ for a highway which cannot even handle today’s traffic?? The document cited Asheville’s inability to annex as a reason why land is too valuable to use. I believe Asheville should seek to overturn the law so that it can annex Candler and Arden. As a side note, generally unincorporated areas are more run down (remember Cleanup Candler) because there aren’t the necessary laws preventing bad behavior or elected officials who find ways to beautify them. Also, both parts A and C are funded so there is no reason not to focus on both.

    • Big Al

      “…Asheville should seek to overturn the law so that it can annex Candler and Arden.”

      I needed a good laugh, thanks so much!

      I can hear them guffawing in Raleigh, too.

        • AVL LVR

          Well Moffitt, I think it will be quite possible to overturn considering you are out and it is not really a Republican vs Democrat thing. Other states have every inch of their state (every rural areas) incorporated so it is far from strange to incorporate urban areas. Asheville should lower its taxes and this could be a way to do it and raise its profile nationally.

  5. “so it is far from strange to incorporate urban areas.”

    What seems far from strange is that the City of Asheville would have any influence in the state legislature, now or in the future, to get what it wants. Do you disagree? They have lost forced annexation, they have lost ETJ, they have lost the airport, they have lost Biltmore Lake, they have lost countywide elections, they lost the CRA, they have lost the business privilege tax, they have lost the progressive stranglehold on city council, and they have lost the water system. What is far from strange is Asheville continuing its losing streak. From where I sit, very far indeed.

    • bsummers

      they have lost the progressive stranglehold on city council, and they have lost the water system

      A) Huh? I think you’ve confused your Fantasy City Council League™ outcome with reality.

      B) Getting a little ahead of yourself, aren’t you Skippy?

    • bsummers

      We’ll call the NC Supreme Court and let them know that you said it’s over.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.