Local Matters: Thoughts on Asheville’s WE DO campaign
Posted on by Margaret Williams and David Forbes
Reporter David Forbes talks about the Asheville-based WE DO campaign, which has been in the national press recently for their high-profile actions in support of LGBT marriage rights. Hosted by Margaret Williams.
Podcast produced by Steve Shanafelt. The theme music is “jam band spy song” by E. Lee.
SHARE
Thanks for reading through to the end…
We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.
We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.
The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.
One thought on “Local Matters: Thoughts on Asheville’s WE DO campaign”
James Dye
The Campaign for Southern Equality has embarked on a mission that is heroic. That so many local communities of faith have joined to defy North Carolina’s unjust marriage laws, which may soon be codified in the state’s constitution, is testimony to the role that religion plays in the civil rights struggle. Civil rights are human rights; religion, while often concerned with the divine, nonetheless speaks to the human condition. Lesbians and gays are human, and what could be more human–or civil–than our right to marry?
Senator Forrester and his ilk argue the convenient Fox News soundbite that marriage is an institution between a man and a woman. They term this ‘traditional marriage.’ But whose tradition? Almost every Native American tribe recognised same-sex marriages; such marriages enjoyed a three-hundred-year tradition in China. And while the long-standing Christian institution (a thousand years or more) of adelphopoiesis may be rendered ‘same-sex union,’ it was, truth be told, more like a modern marriage of equals than traditional heterosexual marriage going back to the palaeolithic. Indeed, ‘traditional marriage,’ which Sen. Forrester would make the law for North Carolina, was usually of the arranged–even forced–variety. One wonders if Sen. Forrester would have been content with the marriage his parents, close relatives, or tribal elders might have arranged for him.
The Campaign for Southern Equality has embarked on a mission that is heroic. That so many local communities of faith have joined to defy North Carolina’s unjust marriage laws, which may soon be codified in the state’s constitution, is testimony to the role that religion plays in the civil rights struggle. Civil rights are human rights; religion, while often concerned with the divine, nonetheless speaks to the human condition. Lesbians and gays are human, and what could be more human–or civil–than our right to marry?
Senator Forrester and his ilk argue the convenient Fox News soundbite that marriage is an institution between a man and a woman. They term this ‘traditional marriage.’ But whose tradition? Almost every Native American tribe recognised same-sex marriages; such marriages enjoyed a three-hundred-year tradition in China. And while the long-standing Christian institution (a thousand years or more) of adelphopoiesis may be rendered ‘same-sex union,’ it was, truth be told, more like a modern marriage of equals than traditional heterosexual marriage going back to the palaeolithic. Indeed, ‘traditional marriage,’ which Sen. Forrester would make the law for North Carolina, was usually of the arranged–even forced–variety. One wonders if Sen. Forrester would have been content with the marriage his parents, close relatives, or tribal elders might have arranged for him.