Plenty of news this week. Weigh in on what you wish, readers.
Thanks for reading through to the end…
We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.
We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.
Before you comment
The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.
According to our new “most viewed” tabulator, most-viewed #avlnews = cesspool http://bit.ly/rno62q Sunday open thread http://t.co/d5byCFIz
And most commented-on newsblog = our report about the top-two finalists in the city-county’s search for a new community-media project: http://bit.ly/qwjdjP
Rep. Tim Moffitt introduced a supplementary bill in the State General Assembly that would make the A-B Tech sales tax revenue binding, which it presently is not. That is, it would require that the revenues realized by the sales tax increase must be spent on A-B Tech infrastructure improvements only and nothing else. Sen. Martin Nesbitt killed the bill through parliamentary procedure. Why? Discuss.
………………………………..
That’s an interesting twist.
Simple answer about corrupt Nesbitt killing the revenue specific tax bill…Nesbitts crowd wants to be able to spend the money anyway they please without regard to the voters. Typical democrat
M.O.D. last 140 years in NC!
Link to Scribd account on Buncombe County Commissioners Compensation. With Comparisons to other Counties;
http://www.scribd.com/doc/65419828/Buncombe-County-Commissioners-Salary-Totals-and-Comparison-1
You would think that someone would have written something along the lines of “all changes in compensation, perquisites, and other forms of remuneration for elected officials of Buncombe County shall go before the people in a general election.”
Oh, wait. No. You wouldn’t think that at all.
How about the Buncombe County Economic Development Commission, which has seventeen members, only two of whom are elected by voters, and gets to dole out property tax revenues in the form of corporate incentives?
Or the TDA…that Board needs some close watching.
This board? http://www.buncombecounty.org/governing/commissioners/ArchivedAgenda/20101207/documents/EDCREZDRAFT113010_000.pdf
Yes, that board, enabled by NCGS 158.
Where’s the reporting on the New Belgium story? I’ve heard from a number of sources that it’s a done deal…
Why were there no new cartoons from Molton & Brent Brown this week?
Good question! I’ll alert the Web team.
Where’s the reporting on the New Belgium story?
Do you mean the possibility that New Belgium (beer) is considering an Asheville location and/or that the company may be seeking an economic-development incentive from the city of Asheville and Buncombe County? Only rumors so far. But … both City Council and County Commissioners have met in closed session recently to discuss an unnamed economic-development incentive.
Here’s Buncombe County’s economic-development incentives policy: http://www.buncombecounty.org/common/Admin/EconomicPolicy.pdf
And the city of Asheville’s: http://www.ashevillenc.gov/uploadedFiles/Business/Business_In/Economic_Development/IncentivePolicy.PDF
Economic incentives, noun: a set of tax breaks used to entice businesses into an area into which they would have moved to anyway, in an effort to shift the tax burden onto the working class, where it clearly belongs.
Mat, I sense a little cynicism :)
WOW, Margaret….you are SOOOO perceptive. <;-)
Me? Cynic? Noooooooooooooooooooo.
Seriously, though, I’ve tried to look at New Belgium’s “triple bottom line” silliness online. A lot of it talks about the “people” and “planet” but not much about “profit”.
In my opinion, companies that are posting profits have little business asking for or receiving tax breaks and incentives – especially when the burden of those are passed onto the very people supposedly being “helped” by new jobs being created.
But I understand my old-school notions in this arena are being pushed to the wayside by our new “global economy”.
I assure you, the New Belgium deal is a lot more than just a rumor at this point. Where’s the dirt digging investigative reporting?
Digging in process, but no official, on-the-record confirmation from primary sources.
Don’t these secretive, behind-closed-doors meetings violate open meetings laws? Especially if they’re basically subsidizing the New Belgium venture with tax dollars…
Council has 9 matters of business that allow it to go into closed session; no. 4 relates to economic incentives:
Chapter 143 of N.C. General Statutes:
And here we are again: why are “incentives” a trigger for closed meetings?
Do they just not want the people to know how the tax burden is being shifted to the working class and off of companies that are posting profits, quarter after quarter; year after year?
I do like the new open thread addition. Lot’s of mind bending stuff, on here. Keep it up.
House Bill 326
2011-2012 Session
Buncombe Local Sales Tax for Comm. Colleges.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2011/Bills/House/HTML/H326v2.html
……………………….
Mat, I’ve often wondered why econ-incentives trigger closed sessions. I can kind of understand some of the other rules
Closed sessions that center around “incentives” sounds a lot like “good ole boy & girl” sessions. I s’pose the legal talk could be used as the reasoning. But still closed sessions to discuss incentives, has a stench to it.
Sales tax money goes into the county’s general fund. Voters should be aware that voting for the sales-tax increase is giving the county commissioners a blank check to spend in anyway they choose.
………………………..
Doesn’t the city of Asheville get a cut of sales-tax revenue?
Yes, Margaret, the City gets a cut. There are two ways that the percentage given to the City can be determined (under law) and the County consistently uses the one which gives the City less money. About 75 percent of the sales tax collected in Buncombe is collected in Asheville, but we get about 19 percent of what the state hands to Buncombe.
I concur that economic incentives should not be discussed behind closed doors. It is a rule entirely concocted to “protect” insider information. The result is that Staff consults with businesses and with County Staff and with the state government and with the Economic Development Commission, and all of the other secret players, and concocts a deal … which Council then rubber stamps. The argument is made: “If we vote ‘no’ after all that good-faith negotiation, we’ll get a reputation for being unfriendly to business.” Bunch of B.S.
Cecil, perhaps dents can be made in the “good ole boy/girl system. Do you have any suggestions???