The Kenilworth conundrum: City Council weighs subdivision rules

As they pondered a 162-unit development at Thoms Estate North Asheville last night, Asheville City Council noted similarities to another project reported in this week’s Mountain Xpress (see “Go Tell it on the Mountain”). The 65-acre subdivision going up on Beaucatcher Mountain bypassed council review, as it conformed to the Technical Review Committee’s subdivision ordinance.

With another development looming, and the developer threatening to make a similar move if Council refuses a rezoning request, Council members spoke up on the Beaucatcher Heights  construction that has riled Kenilworth neighbors into calling for the city to reform its development ordinances:

• “While what happened in Kenilworth is not the doing of Council, it does frighten me.” — Vice Mayor Holly Jones

• “There’s going to be a subdivision that’s going to be devastating on that mountain.” — Council member Jan Davis

• “We get pushed out of the loop when it comes to subdivisions.” — Council member Robin Cape

Meanwhile, Mayor Terry Bellamy noted that the subdivision rules were put in place when the city had different development priorities than it has today. The Thoms Estate development was tabled by Council, and it remains to be seen how the developer will respond. Look for full coverage of the meeting in the Feb. 21 Xpress.

Now more than ever, the question is out there: Does City Council need increased review power over subdivisions?

— Brian Postelle, staff writer

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “The Kenilworth conundrum: City Council weighs subdivision rules

  1. wjell

    It seems to me that Kenilworth has become the poster child for “development we missed the ball on” for Council. They all want absolution for their oversight, but I don’t see any Council members taking a long hard look to see if TRC or staff did their job correctly.

    Let’s face it, in Ashville only one neighborhood gets ongoing representation by Council… Downtown. Council can spend years on what to do with the Civic Center, downtown parking or drum circles and not feel the footsteps of the out of town developers as they overrun residential neighborhoods. Is it coincidence that they are targeting Asheville? I think not.

  2. The City Council passes on many things, some small, some large, but the glories of Beaucather Ridge will, if not curtailed, show that not only does the city need a logging code within its hallowed ground, it needs control over subdivisions, too.
    The residents of Kenilworth–who have paid millions of dollars in property taxes since joining the city alomst a century ago–were denied the right that every citizen of Washington has, the right to lobby before the City Council! And don’t suggest showing up and trying to make points at a Technical Review Committee (TRC) meeting; these men of the TRC have tunnel vision and never listen to the audience at one of their salutes to development, they just give the plat an OK. If something is wrong–like a homesite sitting twenty feet above a gulley–the developer simply says, “We’ll fix that before the next review,” and everybody goes home happy!
    They’re moving to Asheville in droves only to find a few years down the line, that the beauty they wanted is gone and it’s now all a retirement slum! Talk about killing the goose . . .

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.