Two months later, District Attorney still won’t release evidence room records

Over two months ago, Xpress requested a copy of the audit of the Asheville Police Department’s evidence room from District Attorney Ron Moore. We have received no reply. According to attorneys from the North Carolina Press Association, the audit should be public record, and Moore’s behavior violates the state’s open records law.

When the news broke last year that significant amounts of guns, drugs and money were missing from the APD evidence room, it sent a shock through the city, and Chief Bill Hogan resigned soon after. At that time, Moore released preliminary reports from an earlier partial audit showing problems with the evidence storage. Asheville City Council approved $175,000 for a full audit.

That audit was concluded on Jan. 9, but Moore has not released the results, either to the larger public or to city officials. On Jan. 20, after Moore’s receptionist informed Xpress that “he never checks [his email],” and no other official could turn over the record, an open-records request was faxed to his office, asking that he make the audit report public or cite a specific statutory reason why he couldn’t.

Under North Carolina’s open records law, public officials must comply with open records requests “as promptly as possible.”

Moore has claimed to other media outlets that the records aren’t public because they’re involved in an ongoing criminal investigation, but according to the law, “the use of a public record in connection with a criminal investigation or the gathering of criminal intelligence shall not affect its status as a public record.”

That means, notes Amanda Martin, an attorney for the North Carolina Press Association, that while internal memos on possible charges and the like are certainly not public, the audit report should be.

Mike Tadych, also a press association attorney, agrees.

“It’s an audit, a report showing discrepancies,” Tadych says. “Typically an audit doesn’t point fingers, it just says ‘this doesn’t reconcile.’”

While state statute doesn’t set a specific time limit, Tadych observes two months well exceeds the requirement that records be provided “promptly.”

“Certainly, with this record, you could find the copying machine in two months time,” Tadych tells Xpress.

“I could be wrong,” he adds with a chuckle. “But it would have to be really, really broken.”

Last Friday, March 23, Xpress faxed another open records request to Moore. This one signed by this reporter, News Editor Margaret Williams and Publisher Jeff Fobes, calling on Moore to turn over the evidence room audit report promptly. We have received no reply.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

8 thoughts on “Two months later, District Attorney still won’t release evidence room records

  1. Dionysis

    Seems as if he’s trying to hide something. Legal action should be initiated to force compliance.

    • Barry Summers

      “That means, notes Amanda Martin, an attorney for the North Carolina Press Association, that while internal memos on possible charges and the like are certainly not public, the audit report should be.

      Mike Tadych, also a press association attorney, agrees.

      “It’s an audit, a report showing discrepancies,” Tadych says. “Typically an audit doesn’t point fingers, it just says ‘this doesn’t reconcile.'”

      The audit of the evidence locker itself is not a criminal investigation, any more than an audit of the books would be. But if that audit led to say, an investigation of embezzlement, that would not be made public until charges are brought.

      I think he’s on really thin ice keeping this audit secret. Besides, it cost the City $175,000. Let’s see what that taxpayer money was spent on.

  2. glolady

    I was told the report was not released because of an ongoing SBI investigation by an APD officer who returned my call through the Mayor’s office.

    Ron Moore needs to understand Karma. The death sentence would be too good for him. Retiring to the place where he sent numerous innocent people, then Justice will be served for all those who needlessly suffered because of Ron Moore’s actions and inaction.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.