Council approves downtown restroom project after heated debate

MIXED PRIORITIES: Council member Antanette Mosley, who voted against the restroom project, said she got a call from a community member saying City Council cares more about where people use the restroom than the education of Black children. Screenshot courtesy of the City of Asheville

Tension was high at the Feb. 13 Asheville City Council meeting as Council members decided the fate of a plan to install a 24-hour, prefabricated restroom unit outside the Rankin Avenue parking garage. After a somewhat fervent discussion among Council members, the board approved the project, 5-1, with Antanette Mosley opposed.

As previously reported by Xpress, the restroom will be a Portland Loo, a 7-by-10-foot single-stall structure that will provide enough room for a wheelchair, bike or stroller. Capital Projects Director Jade Dundas said the facilities are built to be more resistant to vandalism and easier to clean. The bathroom’s blue interior lighting also makes it difficult for intravenous drug users to find a vein for injection. Additionally, there will be routine after-hours checks by the city’s new parking garage security contractor, Walden Security.

The council approved $183,620 for site enhancements and installation with a contingency amount of $46,724, as well as $170,760 for the restroom itself. The total is $401,104. The restroom will be funded with $650,000 in American Rescue Plan Act dollars, allocated for the project in May 2022.

The vote, initially scheduled for  Council’s Jan. 23 meeting, was delayed after several members asked to explore other downtown bathroom options — specifically reopening restrooms at 29 Haywood St. that were closed in 2020. City officials cited increased maintenance costs, drug use and vandalism as causes for its permanent closure.

Cost projections presented to the Council found that upfront expenses were higher for the prefabricated Portland Loo than reopening the Haywood facility, but long-term costs were significantly lower.

“Overall, in a five-year time frame, the costs associated with reopening 29 Haywood St. is significantly higher than the Portland Loo,” said Dundas. “With 24/7 security, the cost would be almost double.”

Dundas noted that adding the prefabricated unit does not prevent reopening the 29 Haywood St. restrooms or installing other free-standing restrooms. He said the city is in early talks with the Asheville Downtown Association, whose offices are near the Haywood Street facilities, to reopen and maintain those bathrooms for daytime usage.

“The expectation would be that the bathrooms would only be open during daytime, weekday hours, when the [Asheville Downtown Association] is open,” Dundas said. “In that scenario, with no additional security and daytime use only, the total first-year costs for reopening 29 Haywood St. are estimated to be $21,500.”

ARPA priorities 

The Portland Loo discussion expanded to include a conversation about ARPA funds for PEAK Academy, which requested $590,000 in October to help keep the school open through the rest of the school year. City Manager Debra Campbell said PEAK submitted a written request, but a formal application is still needed to meet federal guidelines for ARPA funds.

Several community members expressed concern that funding the restroom would prevent the Council from being able to support PEAK. Council members stated that the two projects would be considered separately.

“There is a false narrative that this is either/or,” said Council member Kim Roney. “We need funding for public bathrooms and for PEAK Academy. I hope that PEAK provides a path to [do so] and applies for ARPA and/or strategic partnership funds, and I intend to support it.”

Council member Antanette Mosley, the sole opposing vote, said that Council should make clear its support for PEAK funding so that community members don’t continue to think the two projects are competing for funding.

“I got a call from a member of the community saying that we care more about where people take a s*** than we do about Black children,” Mosley said. “I don’t want to leave that impression with the community.”

“How can we as a city even consider the kind of spend on a single toilet for the houseless folks here in Asheville, among others, when Asheville’s education achievement gap is the worst in North Carolina?” asked resident Kimberly Collins during public comment. “PEAK Academy, a school that is actually closing that gap, has made a request. … I am asking that instead of dying on this mountain of a [$650,000] single toilet, that you do consider the request from PEAK in the fullness of the amount that they have asked for.”

While Council briefly discussed delaying the bathroom vote again, Dundas said the city would be forced to rebid for the project, resulting in higher costs and potentially eating further into remaining ARPA funds.

Mayor Esther Manheimer said more conversations around ARPA funding would come at a later date and PEAK was invited to make a formal application. With the approval of the bathroom, about $1 million in ARPA money is left to be allocated.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Chase Davis
Chase Davis is an Asheville-based reporter working for Mountain Xpress. He was born and raised in Georgia and holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science from LaGrange College. Follow me @ChaseDavis0913

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

10 thoughts on “Council approves downtown restroom project after heated debate

  1. Pierce

    This town is a laughable joke. 650k. Anyone who voted for this and supports this is why Asheville is in decline.

  2. Bright

    $650k for bathrooms when the water infrastructure is shot to h@#l. Other cities have great public restroom facilities…but other cities also have a good foundation upon which to improve. Fix the water infrastructure, or else this stupidity will have to use soft drinks or beer as the water for the poopoo pits.

  3. Enlightened Enigma

    Please nominate Mayor Manheimer and Kim Roney to be the first two humans to utilize this new facility ! Maybe we have a contest to see who’s #1 and #2 ? Can we have this as a community fundraiser to offset the costs with a big crowd present for news media around the world ?

    • indy499

      Not an interesting question. the mayor is just a mope. Roney is a liar and manipulator which is far more dangerous.

  4. WNC

    It shouldn’t be over 10% more cost to install 2 units as opposed to 1 unit if you’re doing this project. Surely this prefabbed deal is available with 2 stalls.

  5. KW

    City should sell yearly bathroom passes (price tbd). All funds go to PEAK. Residents and tourists can afford this. Unhoused population can obtain their pass through one of the nonprofits when they voluntarily register and provide personal details to be utilized in a database with the ultimate goal of helping the unhoused who legitimately wish to improve their situation. Feel free to send me some money for saving funds that would be squandered for consultants who would never offer this solution.

  6. indy499

    Not an interesting question. the mayor is just a mope. Roney is a liar and manipulator which is far more dangerous.

  7. indy499

    Idfcitizens voted on things like this it wouldn’t be either or, it would be neither

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.