Edwards flips on Buncombe occupancy tax reform

Chuck Edwards
CHANGED MAN: Republican Sen. Chuck Edwards said on June 10 that he supported shifting the allocation of Buncombe County's occupancy tax, an about-face from the position he had expressed in late February. Photo courtesy of Edwards

As local pressure mounts for the N.C. General Assembly to change how Buncombe County’s occupancy tax revenues can be spent, a key state lawmaker has changed his take on the matter. At a June 10 meeting of the Council of Independent Business Owners, an Asheville-based trade group, Republican Sen. Chuck Edwards said he had “come around to the way of thinking of the folks in the county” who want less of the tax to go toward tourism marketing.

That position marks an about-face from the hard line Edwards, who represents Henderson County and the eastern third of Buncombe County, drew in previous remarks to CIBO. “This is not the time to talk about redistribution in any manner,” he had said on Feb. 26.

While Edwards did not explain the rationale behind his new stance, it aligns with a proposal endorsed by the Asheville Buncombe Hotel Association, a group representing local hotel owners. Current legislation requires the Buncombe County Tourism Development Authority to spend 75% of Buncombe’s occupancy tax revenue on marketing the region, with the remaining 25% allocated toward “tourism-related capital expenditures.” The proposed change would shift those percentages to two-third and one-third, respectively.

The Buncombe County Board of Commissioners also appears interested in changing the legislation. The board’s June 1 agenda listed a discussion of the county’s hotel occupancy tax policy, which had been added at the request of Chair Brownie Newman and Commissioners Jasmine Beach-Ferrara and Al Whitesides, all Democrats. The discussion was pulled from the agenda prior to that meeting and has yet to be rescheduled.

But even with Edwards’ support, it remains unclear if the changes can pass. He said that “a long-standing debate between long-term members of the Senate and House” had made his colleagues reluctant to consider any occupancy tax legislation; he did not name specific members responsible for the impasse or describe the nature of that debate.

In other news

Edwards also responded to an Xpress question about his role in denying the confirmation of Dionne Delli-Gatti, Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s pick to become secretary of the state Department of Environmental Quality. As reported by N.C. Policy Watch, Delli-Gatti is Cooper’s first cabinet-level official nomination to be rejected since Republican lawmakers voted to start holding confirmation hearings in 2017.

“Plain and simple, she was not qualified to run the department,” Edwards argued, noting that he personally led the debate on the Senate floor on the June 3 motion to deny Delli-Gatti’s confirmation. He based that claim on what he described as Delli-Gatti’s “very limited knowledge” regarding several controversial pipeline projects for which the Cooper administration had denied permits. “There’s a real war against natural gas,” he added.

However, North Carolina’s largest utility companies, which are heavily reliant on natural gas, supported Delli-Gatti’s appointment. Duke Energy released a statement backing her confirmation on June 2, as did Dominion Energy. “We have appreciated her willingness to collaborate on key energy issues and the perspective she brings as the state works together to chart a path forward,” the Duke statement read.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Daniel Walton
Daniel Walton is the former news editor of Mountain Xpress. His work has also appeared in Sierra, The Guardian, and Civil Eats, among other national and regional publications. Follow me @DanielWWalton

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Edwards flips on Buncombe occupancy tax reform

  1. Mike R.

    75% and 25% currently; 67% and 33% proposed.
    Big deal! It’s hardly worth all the trouble.

    One way it could be changed quickly is if a number of the larger hoteliers simply boycotted sending in this tax revenue until a 50/50 split was passed. This civil disobedience would work. Question is, do the hoteliers want to support such a move or do they like all this tax money going for more promotion?

  2. luther blissett

    “The discussion was pulled from the agenda prior to that meeting and has yet to be rescheduled.”

    If the county commission defers discussion of the occupancy tax — and it’s not on the June 15 agenda — then state law makes clear that any subsequent action won’t take effect until the start of the 2022-23 fiscal year. The can will have been kicked down the road. (The June 15 agenda does include the appointment of TDA chair Himanshu Karvir to the AB Tech board of trustees, so I guess it might have been awkward to deal with both.)

    The talk of zeroing out the occupancy tax may have focused the minds of hoteliers and our colonial governor Chuck Edwards. But changing the marketing / TPDF split is an insufficient given the legal requirement that TPDF funds must go to “heads on beds” projects.

  3. Curious

    Does anyone have any real information (not speculation) as to why Mr. Edwards is changing his position?

  4. NFB

    Meh. Just a shell game. Shift a little bit of money around and distract from the fact that the TDA still refuses to even discuss or consider allowing at least a small portion of the room tax to go to help pay for infrastructure and services that tourists use and give locals a bit less of a burden in paying for it all.

    With the TDA budget around $25 million this year this “change” will mean that instead of a roughly $19 million marketing budget it will have a roughly $17 million marketing budget, and $6 million on heads in beds project to $8 million. The TDA will still get 100% of its slush fund to spend, it just that a small amount of it will shift from one of its priority to the other one. The TDA’s contempt for the local yokel rubes continues.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.