Regional Recycling Solutions faces ‘chicken or the egg’ dilemma

A public hearing at the Buncombe County Board of Adjustments' July 8 meeting brought in around 100 people — most of them opposing the proposed Regional Recycling Solutions facility on Pond Road.

After two years of planning, a heated community forum and a three-hour debate on the definition of the word “disposal,” partners of Regional Recycling Solutions are, legally, stuck between a rock and a hard place.

More than 100 people showed up for the July 8 Buncombe County Board of Adjustments meeting, causing the location of the meeting to shift from its usual home at 30 Valley St. to the downstairs conference room at 200 College St.

Why such an unusually large crowd? A public hearing for the controversial proposed recycling facility in Southwest Asheville, near Enka-Candler.

Neighbors of the proposed Pond Road facility arrived ready to fight for their community, wearing stickers that read, “Say no to Regional Recycling Solutions.”

Among those opposing the facility was president of Woodfin’s Curbside Management recycling center, Barry Lawson. “We’ve spent 20 years trying to educate residents and business-owners” on separating their recycling, he said. “And somebody comes in and says it’s OK to throw it all into one pile.”

It’s undoing years of our work, he continued.

Implementing practices different than the standard blue-bin-collections, RRS managing partner Ken Allison said in June that he believes his vision for a multistream system is what’s causing the misconception of a landfill-like facility.

But many neighbors and skeptics, including Lawson, are convinced that Allison’s “European technology” is nothing more than a dirty MRF — a dirty material recovery facility, which is looked down upon by many waste management organizations.

But, at a community forum hosted by RRS on May 26, Allison remained adamant that his facility is not a dirty MRF — and that, because those facilities are generally considered outdated and a poor investment, the partners at RRS would not be looking into this type of technology.

However, when it was time on the agenda for the RRS debate, Attorney for the Board of Adjustments Curt Euler explained to the crowd that this particular item would be broken into two parts: a legal debate, questioning the ability of the board to vote on this topic, and a public hearing for the neighbors to voice their community concerns.

During part one, Euler explained, both sides’ attorneys would debate the extent of the board’s legal authority — and then the board would vote either for or against their own authority to grant or approve the facility’s permit. Part two, he continued, may not be necessary following the decision made in part one.

“I know a lot of you are here to speak,” he said. “But we may not get there today.”

The crowd began to boo, and Euler reminded the audience to respect the speakers and treat the meeting as if it were a courtroom.

Attorney Derek Allen, hired by the Friends and Farmers for a Safe Pond Road to voice the opposition, explained that the county board “must reject the application,” as, by county standards, the application is incomplete without first being approved by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

On the other hand, RRS cannot gain approval from the NCDENR without first receiving approval from the county — trapping the company in a paradoxical loop of permitting problems.

The catch-22 stems from vague wording in the county’s zoning ordinance and RRS’ plans to house a waste transfer station at the front of the recycling facility — sorting out nonrecyclable materials and transferring them to a landfill.

Defined by the ordinance, a solid waste facility is any land, personnel and/or equipment in the management of solid waste, including a transfer station, landfill or materials recovery facility.

Later, it reads: “All solid waste management facilities used for the disposal of solid waste shall meet the requirements and specifications of [DENR],” and must submit a “set of approved plans … along with the application for the conditional use permit.”

The debate went back and forth between Allen and RRS’ attorney David Matney, who insisted that, because of the wording, the NCDENR requirements only apply to facilities that are used for the actual disposal of solid waste — like landfills — not transfer stations.

Nothing would be disposed of at the RRS site, he stated. The facility is for sifting through waste, filtering out the recyclable materials and sending the rest to the appropriate facility. Without disposing of any materials on site, the facility does not need prior approval from the DENR, Matney said.

Allen retorted, “If the zoning ordinance is meant to apply only to landfills, then it should say ‘landfills’ rather than ‘solid waste management facilities.'”

Typing “disposal” into the search bar on his laptop, Euler read aloud definitions of the word from two different online dictionary sites. “According to Google,” he said, as many laughed, “it means the act or process of throwing away or getting rid of something.”

And after much debate, the board had to make a decision: renounce their legal authority over the conditional use permit without prior DENR approval, as implied in the zoning ordinance, or interpret “disposal” to mean specifically “landfill” and move forward with the application — calling forward the 100 or so members of the public to argue for or against the application’s approval.

In the end, the vote was unanimous: the Buncombe County Board of Adjustments cannot vote on RRS’ conditional use permit without first receiving approval from DENR — upholding the words, as they’re written, in the county ordinance.

And what does that mean for RRS? “Either party has an opportunity under the law to appeal [the board’s] order to a superior court,” Euler explains. “Ultimately, it would be up to a superior court to decide.”

But, as far as a company getting stuck in neither-approval-nor-denial limbo, “there is definitely a problem there,” he continues. “From an employee-standpoint, we need to fix it. We need to be clear about what we’re doing.”

Whether an amendment to the ordinance calling for more specific wording would positively or negatively affect RRS’ application, he says he doesn’t know.

But, to get to that point, “Someone, either on staff, the planning board or commissioners, would need to say, ‘We need to amend this and fix this problem.’ Then, it will go to the planning board, where they will make a decision. And, ultimately, it will go to the county commission” for final approval.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Hayley Benton
Current freelance journalist and artist. Former culture/entertainment reporter at the Asheville Citizen-Times and former news reporter at Mountain Xpress. Also a coffee drinker, bad photographer, teller of stupid jokes and maker-upper of words. I can be reached at hayleyebenton [at] Follow me @HayleyTweeet

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Regional Recycling Solutions faces ‘chicken or the egg’ dilemma

  1. Lloyd Pike

    Thanks for the great coverage of the hearing. I also enjoyed the recent coverage by Mountain Xpress of the extensive challenges the area has faced cleaning up the French Broad River and protecting it as a major tourist attraction. I was amazed that Buncombe County zoning would even entertain placing an industrial waste processing facility such as the one proposed within 100 feet of a large creek feeding into the French Broad River just above Asheville. One accident at the facility that was proposed could undo decades of effort and cost many millions of dollars in visitor revenue. So, while we are reviewing the meaning of “disposal”, perhaps we should also review zoning designations to afford more protection to our fragile water resources. Please keep up the great coverage!

  2. Jonnie

    OMG They are now in Haywood County trying to turn our beautiful, serene, beautiful, calm Beaver Dam Community into a recycle dump!!!!! Buncombe got rid of them and now they are here! OMG!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.