In defense of Kava: Local Vanuatu Kava Bar owner speaks out about a Consumer Reports claim

Andrew Procyk is co-owner of Vanuatu Kava Bar in Asheville, N.C; managing partner of Kava Terra LLC; a Florida-based kava import company, and founder of NAKAMAL, the North American Kava Merchant Advocacy League. Here’s what he submitted to Xpress:
 
Consumer Reports magazine recently published an article detailing the so-called “Dirty Dozen” herbal supplements. The article was picked up by major national news media outlets, going viral in short order. Among the “dirty dozen” was the herb, kava — a perfectly legal substance said to cause a relaxing effect.

The article cited a 2002 statement by the Food and Drug Administration that issued a warning about the herb at about the same time the European Union banned the import of kava altogether, in reaction to several dozen cases of liver toxicity in which kava supplements were suspected. To be fair, the FDA’s response was cautionary and mild compared to that of the the E.U.
 
When the events of the “Kava Liver Scare of ‘02” unfolded, it crippled many South Pacific economies that rely on kava export as their major cash crop. The predicament led to the formation the International Kava Executive Council.

A copious amount of peer-reviewed research has been published by the group, much of it turning the liver-toxicity claims on their head. Research conducted by Vincent LeBot, a specialist in Pacific tuber botany, was particularly convincing.
 
A World Health Organization paper published in 2007 concluded that kava-related liver toxicity is rare and suggests a possible link between ethanolic- and acetonic-based extracts (as opposed to kava tea or water-based extracts, for which further research is suggested). The same paper goes on to state that “None of the events reported were classified as certain.”

In November of 2008, not long after the W.H.O. findings were published, the E.U. lifted the import ban on kava. It seems ludicrous that, after an entire continent removes a product ban as a result of demonstrated safety in current research, the fear-mongering continues in the U.S.

In researching the organization from which CR got their information, the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, billed as “Unbiased” and “Independent,” I learned that the organization’s funding has come from subscribers to the database in recent years — the bulk of which are medical professionals.

As far as the safety of non-extract based natural kava tea, it’s interesting to note the kava-related health problems —  or rather the lack thereof — of the kava-consuming South Pacific. There, women are not allowed near kava, while men often drink it in excess. If kava tea caused serious liver toxicity issues, one would expect to see difference in hepatotoxicity rates between the male and female population of the islands.In fact, a difference does not exist.

Kava shows some promise to treat several of the conditions (anxiety for one) usually treated by best-selling pharmaceutical drugs. Is there an ulterior motive driving the claims against the herb? A patent for a naturally-occurring molecule cannot be obtained. Are there perhaps related powers who would like you to consume their lab-created molecules instead? It seems the failure of the 2010 McCain herbal regulatory bill did not make Pharma very happy. Perhaps this is another salvo in an attempt to get the government to protect you from (gasp!) killer herbs. It seems the headline CBS attached to the article implies that to be the solution: “Why Won’t  Government Protect you from Dirty Dozen.”

Do the people of the U.S. need the government to protect them from the decision to put naturally occurring substances into their bodies, as humanity had done for thousands of years prior to medicinal regulatory agencies? With roughly 50 deaths a year directly related to herbs in the U.S., and 120,000-plus related to pharmaceuticals, I would think, and hope, that answer to be a resounding “no.”

SHARE
About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “In defense of Kava: Local Vanuatu Kava Bar owner speaks out about a Consumer Reports claim

  1. West Asheville

    This place won’t last long…I give them maybe 6 months.

  2. West South Pacific

    I was in there for the first time the other night, and the owner was friendly and extremely intelligent. He can tell you anything you ever hoped to know about the neurological/physiological effects of pretty much anything you put into your body. I’ve tried designer cannabinoids before (any of the JWH-series)which get you high as F, some of which are sold in local head shops (and the Kava Bar), and after he gave me the full run-down on their pros and cons (which no head shop will do), I decided maybe I won’t do that again. He seems honest to a fault, and very well educated on the products he sells. The Kava Bar has a great atmosphere, the Kava made my mouth go numb and induced my nerves to take a siesta, and I’ll be back.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.