We are writing this because we believe that we all should change the way we speak about slavery. The main words we would like to change are “slave,” “slave owner” and “plantation.”
In the case of the word slave, we believe that by calling the enslaved people that, it dehumanizes them and labels them as a commodity, disrespecting those who suffered and putting them in a place where they are remembered as property, not people. By replacing the word slave with enslaved person, you are putting their humanity first, rather than their situation.
As for the term slave owner, we think it enforces the false idea that enslaved people were property to toil for others day and night to bring others wealth and that enslaved people were something to be owned, like an object. By replacing slave owner with enslaver, we don’t promote the ideology of owning other people.
When we think about plantations, we personally reminisce about picnics, skipping through the valley and a nice summer day. Knowing that plantations were not like that in the past and that they were actually places of great torture, we would prefer to call them forced labor camps.
It will be hard to change our vocabulary, but with a conscious effort, we think we can change the way we speak to better suit everybody. It will truly take practice, but that is only because those words are ignorantly embedded in our minds.
— O., Cameron and London
Asheville
Editor’s note: This letter is one of three we received on this topic from students at a local K-8 school.
They are doing the EXACT opposite of what they are claiming to want. A good teacher would have helped them understand that.
“By replacing the word slave with enslaved person, you are putting their humanity first, rather than their situation.”
No, it would literally put their situation first “enslaved”, before their humanity “person”.
I really wish people would stop using kids to push political ideology. It’s a disservice to the kids.
I appreciate that these students are questioning the language we take for granted. “Forced labor camp” sure brings a different picture to mind than “plantation”! Good for these students and teachers for thinking more deeply.
Except that didn’t really happen as I demonstrated.
I prefer “a human being treated like livestock by white supremacists”. This tells the whole story.
young government screwled skulls of mush becoming BIGGER idiots and their parents don’t even see it…get YOUR child OUT of government screwls as FAST as you CAN !
“No, it would literally put their situation first “enslaved”, before their humanity “person”.”
Only in the sense of the sequence of the words. Using “enslaved”, which is an adjective, in front of “person” which is a noun, emphasizes their personhood as the important thing. The fact that they were enslaved is something that was imposed on them, but does not define them. I think these kids are on to something, and I’d like to thank them for bringing it to our attention.
That’s a lot of rationalization to make your point
It’s not “rationalization”, it’s explaining how words work.
totally agree with you, bsummers!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People-first_language
The letter writers are extending the same reasoning used to support people-first-language to describe those living with an illness or disability. I commend the efforts, as well as the learning emphasis on civic engagement.
Are Hegel’s conception of the master-slave dialectic and Nietzsche’s discussion of master-slave morality relevant to understanding these terms?
Since slavery is at least as old a civilization itself I would wager that every human alive today has numerous direct ancestors who were once “enslaved persons”.
This language policing is absolute nonsense. Historical fact states that Blacks in the Antebellum South *were* treated as commodities to be bought and sold, tortured, abused, and toil away for their owners. No reasonable person will deny they were people regardless of the wording. The actual disservice here is the co-signers of this letter trying to lessen and soften the horror that they went through by sanitizing terminology to be less “offensive.”
So how about instead of dwelling on a past that can’t be changed, maybe try focusing on a future that *can* by battling slavery where it’s still practiced today? India today, for example, is home to almost 20 million slaves. The US government has apologized for slavery five times now and it’s blatantly clear now to anyone with at least half a brain that we evil, oppressive White people can try to make amends until the day the Sun swallows the Earth and vaporizes us all, but it’ll simply never be enough.