The column in a recent Mountain Xpress about Progress Energy's dust storage from coal-burning raises a number of interesting points [”When the Dust Settles,” Sept. 29] notes that scrubbers at the facility removed 93 percent of combustion products, so the issue evidently bears on the storage of some remaining residue, approximately seven percent. Were scrubbers in use at TVA before the lagoon burst?
In a scientific study, we might expect that more homework got done. Is there any seepage from the active lagoon and, if so, what's in the escaping leak? We are informed there is bad stuff in that dust, but what actually? Some stuff is mobile, other materials break down or oxidize. Dust falling on someone's windowsill or kids' playset is irritating, but might be said not to constitute a true sample.
While EPA bears the main burden, can't we call on our local university to have a look? Or county or city health people? Couldn't someone knowledgeable (SCS?) have a look at the retaining dam? If it was slapped together hurriedly, surely a fat grant can be generated to build a new one.
— Hollis Thomas
Asheville
Before you comment
The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.