An impassioned retraction

Recently in the Xpress online forums, I made several comments about the Mountain Area Information Network's use of funds meant for WPVM, and suggested WPVM only exists as a source of funding for MAIN. Afterward I was personally contacted by Wally Bowen, executive director of MAIN, calling me out to prove the accuracy of these statements. In fairness I cannot. I cannot claim to know the mind or motivation of Mr. Bowen. Nor have I seen any financial documentation pertaining to MAIN. These statements reflected only my personal opinions and feelings, based on information I have acquired by word of mouth. Since I dislike it when others throw around unsubstantiated information, I should not have done [that].

What I should have said was this:

Regarding community media: Among the definitions of community in my copy of Webster's are: "A group of people living together and having interests, work, etc. in common." "Society; the public." "Ownership or participation in common." Dictionary.com said, among other things, this about media: "The means of communication, as in radio and television, newspapers and magazines, that reach or influence people widely."

I personally define functional community media in two ways: 1) It should give members of the public at large, provided they are willing to put in the time and work, a platform for communication and expression to which they would otherwise not have had access. 2) It should provide the community with programming that would not otherwise be available, including, but not limited to, noncorporate alternatives and programming specifically relevant to said community.

In order for this to happen, [community media] needs to be free of outside influence. Either the content is democratic in nature, or each individual producer is willing to take responsibility for it. Also, a special kind of dedication is needed on the part of producers. It requires a belief in, and a love for what you are producing. WPVM was full of volunteers like this.

I remember seeing the effects of losing an institution that was beloved by a community. It happened more than 20 years ago when my mother's church burned to the ground. After an initial coming together, my mother's circle of friends started to drift apart as everyone started to find new churches. As a teenager, I didn't fully appreciate the situation at the time. It took me years to realize what was lost that day.

I believe that it has not fully sunk in with some what was lost when the majority of volunteers were ousted from WPVM in one fell swoop. I had a show there for only six months, but in that time I saw the love, dedication and devotion so many put into the place, some since its inception. "Starts from scratch" does not begin to describe the situation now. I cringe to think how much knowledge and talent walked, never to return. I believe that even if WPVM is fully restaffed, it will never hold the same place in the heart of this community. Attempts to emulate or replace sacred institutions always fall short. Even if the new product is somehow "better," the old magic never returns.

But then, that's just my opinion.

— Matt Howard
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “An impassioned retraction

  1. Stephanie Morgan

    I applaud you, Matt Howard! You’re courageous. Thank you for your honesty, and for taking full responsibility for your actions in writing the first article.

    Sincerely,
    Stephanie Morgan

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.