Desire

Movie Information

The Asheville Film Society will screen Desire Tuesday, Nov. 15 at 8 p.m. in the Cinema Lounge of The Carolina Asheville and be hosted by Xpress movie critics Ken Hanke and Justin Souther.
Score:

Genre: Romantic Comedy
Director: Frank Borzage
Starring: Marlene Dietrich, Gary Cooper, John Halliday, William Frawley, Ernest Cossart, Alan Mowbray
Rated: NR

Marlene Dietrich’s first film following the departure of her mentor Josef von Sternberg, Desire (1936), is a stylish, glossy romantic comedy co-starring Gary Cooper. Dietrich — in a nonstop procession of those Travis Banton costumes — plays a member of a ring of jewel thieves, who slips a string of stolen pearls in vacationing American Gary Cooper’s jacket pocket in order to get them through customs at the Spanish border. Complications — like Cooper changing jackets and Dietrich stealing his car to get his suitcase — follow, as does the inevitable romance. It’s all very high class and polished — with Dietrich looking as stunning as ever in that special glow that’s in most Paramount pictures of the 1930s. (It’s also obvious that cinematographer Charles Lang is following the lighting designed for her by Sternberg.) The film was directed by Frank Borzage (7th Heaven) and produced (and partly directed) by Ernst Lubitsch (Design for Living) — and has more the feel of a Lubitsch movie than a Borzage one, which isn’t a bad thing, especially with this type of material: as perfect a soufflé of a romantic comedy as you’re likely to find — and with two people who define star power.

Cooper had co-starred with Dietrich in her first Hollywood film, Josef von Sternberg’s Morocco (1930), and it was widely assumed that this was not an experience he cared to repeat. It turned out that it wasn’t Dietrich he’d found troublesome, but Sternberg. That’s not too surprising, since even in the 1950s when Sternberg was taking whatever work he could get, he managed to make John Wayne say, “He scared the hell out of me.” (It came as a shock to Cooper when Sternberg asked him to write the foreword to Sternberg’s autobiography.) The idea of working with Dietrich — especially in a soufflé of a film like this — was appealing to him. That the role of Tom Bradley was the sort of thing he was particularly good at helped. The scene where his adversary (John Halliday) notes, “It would be wrong to underestimate America — it’s a big country,” and Bradley responds, “Six-foot-three,” is quintessential Coop.

The film is an odd affair from the standpoint of its production. It was made during the era when Ernst Lubitsch had accepted the position as head of production at Paramount — a job it’s tempting to think he took for no other reason than to pay back Sternberg for a remark he’d made years earlier (dismissing Lubitsch’s 1928 film The Patriot as “scheisse”). Taking the position made Lubitsch Sternberg’s boss. What that meant is really another story for another time, but before it was over, Sternberg was gone from Paramount and Lubitsch found himself less than happy producing other people’s movies. This had happened once before when George Cukor was supposed to direct One Hour With You (1932) with Lubitsch producing. It wasn’t long before Lubitsch took over the directing. Nothing that extreme happened on Desire with Frank Borzage, but it was in the same neighborhood.

The results are a hybrid of the two directors — an appealing hybrid, but a hybrid all the same. In matters of sex and larceny, Lubitsch can only be described as cheerfully amoral. Borzage, on the other hand, was something of a moralist — not a heavy-handed one, but the tendency was always there. Had Desire been all Lubitsch, the scenes involving the Dietrich character’s regeneration would almost certainly have been in a much lighter tone. The material would have been similar, since the production code had changed things in between Lubitsch’s last directing job and this one, but Borzage takes these later scenes very seriously. In the end, you have a movie that feels like Lubitsch for three-quarters of its length and like Borzage in its home stretch, but with a typically sly Lubitsch spin at the very end.

For Dietrich, the film was important in that it answered the question of whether she could have a screen life after Sternberg. Her one previous attempt at working with another director — Rouben Mamoulian’s Song of Songs (1933) — had been a flop at the box office. This new Dietrich — lighter, funnier, but just as alluring — was just the transition she needed. (Sternberg’s future was less rosy.) It remains one of her most purely enjoyable films.

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.