Putting a name on the I-26 debate

There has been no shortage of stances in the I-26 connector debate. Resolutions have been passed, endorsements made. Buncombe County and the Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce have supported the option known as Alternative 3. Asheville City Council and several community groups and developers have backed the Asheville Design Center-initiated Alternative 4b. (See Xpress ongoing coverage at www.mountainx.com/topics/find/I-26).

Taking it to the street: A petition effort to support the I-26 connector option 4b is being crafted by several residents of the Burton Street neighborhood, who met at the Burton Street Community Center last week. Pictured, from left to right, are Yvette Jives, Asheville Citizen-Times writer Rob Neufeld, Vivian Conley, Austin Hill and Sofi Mahaba. Photo by Jonathan Welch

Now a group of community members is asking Asheville residents to attach their names to the cause. Several Asheville residents, including some living in and near the Burton Street neighborhood, are drafting a petition firmly in support of Alternative 4b. The historically African-American neighborhood would be heavily affected by the adoption of Alternative 3.

“There’s a lot of history there, and there’s a lot of families there,” says Austin Hill, an A-B Tech student and WPVM volunteer who lives near the neighborhood and is helping draft the petition.

The draft praises 4B for its separation of local and interstate traffic and for providing a renewed connectivity between West Asheville and downtown.

All of that, says Hill, figures into the language put to paper so far, which calls for an I-26 plan that “places the fostering and preservation of community as the primary considerations from which all other decisions are made.”

The group is still hashing out the final language and working on disseminating the petition through print and online outlets, and plans to have a final draft circulating within a week.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Putting a name on the I-26 debate

  1. Gordon Smith

    Unfortunately the DOT’s most recent revision of Alternative 4B now has it cutting into Burton St. neighborhood.

  2. Joe Minicozzi

    Word has it that 4b no longer does this and that Alternate 3’s impact to the Burton Street neighborhood is also being modified to minimize housing takings, though I don’t think they will be able to eliminate housing takings. Again, these are all verbals at this point.

    Though NCDOT will be able to adjust Alternate 3 to minimize the impact to Burton Street (the jury is still out until we see the drawings to see if any houses still get taken), Alternate 3 does not separate the interstate traffic from Patton, nor will they be able to do that with the design of that alignment. So the design will have that root failure eventhough it is listed as the primary concern in the community request of 2000.

  3. Gordon Smith

    Thanks, Joe.

    Sounds like the whole situation is really fluid.

    How can folks help right now to preserve Burton St. neighborhood and ensure that local traffic is separated from interstate?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.