Asheville residents gridlocked over I-26 Connector project

MAKING A CONNECTION: Asheville City Council member Julie Mayfield speaks during the comment period at an NCDOT public hearing on Dec. 4 about the I-26 Connector Project. Although she has reservation about the project, Mayfield said the city is trying to make the best of it. Photo by David Floyd

Sometimes, Asheville City Council member Julie Mayfield wishes the Interstate 26 Connector project would just disappear.

“It makes me angry. It makes me sad. It makes me anxious for the future of our city,” Mayfield told a crowd gathered to discuss plans for the roadway on Dec. 4. “I literally dream about this project — although unpleasant dreams are usually called nightmares.”

Upgrades to the tangled web of interchanges from the I-26 intersection at Interstate 40 through the gnarled conduit of traffic on the Bowen Bridge have been on the N.C. Department of Transportation’s radar since at least 1989. Along the way, business groups, community members, environmental advocates, designers and elected officials have all weighed in with differing visions about how the project should function and look — and whether it should happen at all.

The project took what could be one of its final steps toward construction during a public hearing and drop-in session on Dec. 4 at the Renaissance Asheville Hotel, an event that drew between 400 and 500 participants.

Many of those people confronted NCDOT during the public hearing portion of the evening, raising concerns about traffic noise, the scale of the project and its impact on those now living and working in the proposed right of way. Some commenters encouraged NCDOT to take the design back to the drawing board or delay construction on parts of the project while developing a new plan capable of winning broader support.

Mayfield, meanwhile, said the fight has never been to kill the project. “If I thought there was a way to stop this project, I would be with you,” she told the crowd. Instead, she said, city officials have been pushing for ways to make it better.

Montford resident Suzanne Devane of the group Don’t Wreck Asheville called the designs “a horror show.”

“It’ now become this gargantuan, stupid project that resembles octopus tentacles taking care of every traffic problem that Asheville has,” she said before the meeting. “And it shouldn’t be doing that. It should just be a straight shot.”

Project ABCs

NCDOT anticipates crews will begin construction on the $950 million project in 2020. Federal funding will pay 80 percent of the project cost; state funding will cover the rest.

Planners have divided the project into three sections. Section C, the southernmost portion, would reconstruct the existing interchange where I-40 and I-26/I-240 intersect. New circular ramps would allow traffic to easily transition between highways. The plan would also widen I-40 from a point near the Smokey Park Highway interchange to the Brevard Road interchange.

The middle part of the project, section A, would widen I-26/I-240 from four to six lanes and establish a greater degree of separation between Amboy Road and the interstate. An upgraded Amboy Road interchange would include two roundabouts to the north and south, connected by a stretch of road that would run under I-240. Extensions to the north and south would connect the Amboy Road roundabouts to Brevard Road. These extensions would run parallel to I-26/I-240.

Section B would have the most direct impact on downtown Asheville and would establish Patton Avenue as a local boulevard rather than part of I-240 and future I-26.

Three new flyover bridges would carry I-26 and I-240 traffic over the French Broad River. One bridge would serve I-26 eastbound and westbound traffic, while two bridges would carry I-240 traffic.

Derrick Weaver, the NCDOT project manager, anticipates the B section will take about five years to complete. The C section will take about four years, and the A section will require two to three years. Weaver said the sections will have staggered start times, with the goal of completing all parts around the same time.

Many people at the drop-in session seemed intent on developing a more thorough understanding of the project, which was displayed over a series of horizontal maps pinned to boards in the center of the hotel’s ground floor ballroom. “It just looks like such a crazy spaghetti that I’m trying to get my brain around [it],” said North Asheville resident Ann Von Brock.

While she wished NCDOT had considered alternative transportation options to reduce traffic volume as part of the design, Brock said it makes sense to rework road infrastructure to alleviate congestion. “I hate it, but change is inevitable,” she said. “It just looks so spaghetti-ish. That’s what bugs me.”

Sherman Fearing, another Asheville resident who attended the drop-in session, said he’s glad that the plans would separate Patton Avenue traffic from vehicles merging from I-240.

“Hopefully, that’ll lessen the load that we’re seeing through town now across the bridge,” he said. Rush-hour gridlock, he said, makes trips into town for dinner or shopping untenable. “Forget it between 4:30 and 6:30 [p.m.],” he said. “It’s bumper-to-bumper.”

Fearing believes the project is the price Asheville has to pay for the influx of traffic caused by the city’s hotel boom. “It’s been a long time coming,” he said. “This road system is completely antiquated, and given all the hotel rooms that have been developed here in the last five, six, seven years …, now we have to answer to this.”

Gateway to downtown

City leaders believe the changes to Patton Avenue could create a welcoming new front door to downtown Asheville. “Patton Avenue can be Asheville’s grand boulevard, our Champs-Elysées, our Las Ramblas,” Mayfield said, “an iconic street where people live and work, shop and eat and travel safely on foot, by bike, in buses and cars.”

For that to happen, Mayfield said the NCDOT would have to follow the design priorities of the city of Asheville. Although many of those suggestions have found their way into the design, Mayfield said there are a number of larger changes she hopes the city can still negotiate with NCDOT.

One alteration would move a proposed traffic signal on Patton Avenue farther east and remove an exit from I-240, which would make more room for development.

Ideally, Mayfield said, the land would be set aside for mixed-use projects. “We wouldn’t want this to be a whole avenue of hotels or a whole avenue of breweries,” she said. “That’s not the city’s vision for this.”

Mayfield said additional changes could reduce the total footprint of the I-26 project. For example, she proposed, concrete islands at intersections could be eliminated, reducing the project’s cumulative impact on adjacent property owners.

Mayfield also hopes to see some of the smooth curves at the ends of exit ramps sharpened to slow motorists down as they exit onto a local road.

Devane, however, believes the city’s design aspirations — specifically, its plans for Patton Avenue — are not compatible with the overarching goals of the project. “This has always been a federal highway project,” she said. “This has never been a Champs-Elysées project; this has never been an economic development project.”

City leaders, Devane said, are moving forward without a guarantee that their vision for the project will be realized. “All of it is on a hope and a whim,” she said.

“Something needs to be done to fix the congestion; something needs to be done to make I-26 safer to access for people going from Charlotte all the way to Johnson City,” Devane continued. “But this humongous project is not the answer.”

The project did receive some praise from members of the community. Michelle Pace Wood, representing the Enka-Candler Business Association, said her organization has been pushing for the I-26 Connector since 1986. “Our area is cut off from the downtown, and we need better access,” she said. The project, she predicted, would help commerce in Buncombe County.

Make way

NCDOT spokesperson David Uchiyama said the area impacted by the project is “essentially set,” but there could be room for refinements within that footprint based on comments collected at the meeting and in the weeks leading up to NCDOT’s Friday, Jan. 4, comment deadline.

The project’s right of way is anticipated to displace 114 homes, 36 businesses and 2 nonprofits, a reduction from the impact NCDOT estimated in 2015. Plans on the table then would have affected 31 more homes and 20 more businesses.

Zin Vetro bought his house on New Jersey Avenue about a year ago. Now, it’s in the middle of NCDOT’s proposed right-of-way. “I knew it was a possibility,” Vetro said, but until he was confronted with the reality of the highway expansion, he didn’t anticipate that the project would have such a direct impact on him personally.

Vetro said he’s concerned that he and his partner, Mary Kelley, will be priced out of their neighborhood. “They were talking about that they would pay market value at the time of purchase, but that doesn’t account for being able to find a house again … because the prices are just going to continue to go up,” he said.

Kelley co-owns Fleetwood’s on Haywood Road, a combination shop, bar and wedding chapel. The building she and her business partners lease would also be removed to make way for the expansion. Additionally, Kelley’s kids go to school in West Asheville, and she doesn’t know yet if they’ll have to move schools. “It’ll all depend on how much we get and if we can afford to stay in West Asheville and find a three-bedroom house … that’s in our budget,” she said.

Right of way agents will approach affected property owners with the goal of making them whole for the value of their home or business, Uchiyama said.

Out of scale

Robert Sauer lives in North Asheville and owns a building on Riverside Drive that he leases to a business setting up for hemp production. He said the scale of the project is unsettling and seems more appropriate for a larger city.

“I’m concerned that we’re overbuilding, not knowing what the future traffic is going to be,” he said. “I do think it needs improvement. It’s not a good road system as it is.”

Dave Johnson, a 20-year resident of Asheville and retired professor of city planning, said during public comment that he’s been concerned about the I-26 Connector project for a long time. As is, he believes the project would be damaging to Asheville.

“It’s almost too late, some people say, to do it right. I’m not so sure about that,” Johnson said. “Suppose I brought a bag of coins here worth $1,000,000,000 — a billion dollars — and said, ‘OK, here’s $1,000,000,000, Asheville. Spend it on transportation.’ Would we do this? I don’t think so.”

Like Sauer, Johnson believes the project is out of scale with size of Asheville and fails to take into account advances in technology that could make aspects of the design obsolete. “Go back to the drawing board,” he said. “Look at what’s ahead.”

Responding to a question from the audience about whether the project could still be stopped, Jamille Robbins, the moderator for the public hearing and a member of the department’s environmental analysis unit, said nothing is a done deal until the new concrete hits the ground.

“That’s a fact,” he said, as members of the audience applauded his answer. “That’s just a fact.”


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About David Floyd
David Floyd was a reporter for the Mountain Xpress. He previously worked as a general-assignment reporter for the Johnson City Press.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

19 thoughts on “Asheville residents gridlocked over I-26 Connector project

  1. Robin

    As a longtime Asheville resident, I am exceptionally tired of Asheville politicians continually holding up this project. NC-DOT should have started construction on this years ago, but politics, and specifically, Asheville City Council keeps getting in the way. If it doesn’t get rolling soon, normal Asheville citizens should sue the City for the cost difference between when it was pitched in the late 1990’s and now. Maybe Asheville politicians would stop being obstructionists if they were on the hook for the $25 million difference in costs. Of course, Asheville City Council has absolutely no qualms about raising taxes to cover their stupid decisions.

    • Jay Reese

      The Councils actions are a reflection of people’s voice and are in line with modern urban design ideas. Many cities around the world have recqonized the automobile is a burden and are taking steps to reduce the need for people to drive by providing alternatives.

        • Jay Reese

          George there have been numerous surveys conducted by the city asking people how they wanted their city developed and a majority favored walkable neighborhoods, safe access to the roads for all users and alternative forms of transit, especially increased bus service. All these goals require a reduction in car centric infrastructure in favor of building the roads ands streets for moving people not just cars.

        • Nolan McKinney

          I agree with George and actions speak louder than words on a survey. If the majority of people of people wanted to do something other than drive their cars, that’s what they would be doing right now.

          • Jay Reese

            The majority of people surveyed would park their car in favor of active transit given there is safe and effective access. Build it and they will come(ride)

    • luther blissett

      Is there one city in the US that has been improved by being chopped into pieces by interstates? Sure, it improves the commute time (slightly) for the people who move out to the sticks, but the externalities are dumped elsewhere.

      That said, the idea that Patton Ave could be transformed into a “boulevard” is delusional. It’s a stroad. It’s a drag. It will remain so, and its existence makes Haywood Road possible.

      ‘Michelle Pace Wood, representing the Enka-Candler Business Association, said her organization has been pushing for the I-26 Connector since 1986. “Our area is cut off from the downtown…’

      Well, maybe the businesses of Candler would be granted more input over which bits of Asheville get demolished if Candler were part of Asheville instead of freeloading from the margins.

  2. bsummers

    Four years ago, then-Governor Pat McCrory barnstormed into Asheville Airport to promote his “25 Year Vision” for transportation funding. I asked him and his Transportation Secretary, former Brigadier General Anthony Tata, if we could expect tolls to be part of the I-26 project. They refused to rule it out.

    Roy Cooper’s choice to be Secretary of Transportation was former Brigadier General James Trogden. Cooper chose him knowing that Trogden favors tolling. As NCDOT’s former COO, he was front and center defending the controversial I-77 toll project, and he advocated expanded use of tolls all over North Carolina.

    My point is – is anyone covering this asking if we can expect tolls on I-26, and if not, why not?

    • bsummers

      Sorry, I accidentally demoted Trogdon – he was a Major General when he left the Army and went to work for Roy Cooper.

  3. Nolan McKinney

    The state should offer to put billboards along the new connector showing the faces of those who opposed it so their virtue signals will be in our hearts and minds forever as we zip along the new road.

    • Jay Reese

      Yea and drivers will have plenty of time to read them while sitting in traffic on the new road. See the problem with making roads wider is they quickly fill up with new drivers due to a phenomenon called induced demand. The only way to reduce congestion is to remove cars from the road by providing alternative means of transit.

      There is nothing wrong with virtue signaling if your ideas are virtuous. The mode choice you and many others are demanding kills 40,000 people and injures a hundred thousand more every year. It pollutes our air and water and kills billions of animals. The automobiles use is responsible for the bad health outcomes of many of its drivers. The automobile and its fuel source negatively effect our foreign policy resulting in war. Automobile ownership is a drain on low income people who must spend an in-proportionate amount of their income to use one

      • Nolan McKinney

        “See the problem with making roads wider is they quickly fill up with new drivers due to a phenomenon called induced demand. ” I’m willing to bet everyone you will see driving on the newly widened road was also driving on the old one. The connector is a good investment for the future because most people are going to drive. Would you want a bunch of pogo-stickists demanding that your next bike path be reduced to stepping stones? As far as the environment, new vehicles emit less pollution than you seem to realize and oil doesn’t just come from the middle east.

  4. Richard

    Maybe we should start working on these roads before we have a gigantic fire and we all get trapped and we all get burned to death in gridlock. … dot dot dot

  5. Pat

    Asheville has been a wonderful and special city for as long as I’ve been visiting, but unfortunately it is going the way of other big cities– growth for the sake of growth –more roads & traffic, more pollution, less green space, etc. Ultimately its character will be destroyed as it becomes just another Charlotte. I know it’s difficult to stop the DOT from proceeding with its pet projects, but why not think in terms of something completely radical and different? Asheville could limit its population to a certain number of residents and anyone who wanted to move to the city would pay the city a relocation fee ($5K or some amount based on income), for a permit to move there. When someone dies or moves out, a new space is available. Yes, this would create other problems, but what could be more destructive than these large scale construction projects? There isn’t enough space to accommodate everyone and still maintain the beauty and character of the city. Everyone should face the fact that the city, like the earth, is finite and growth doesn’t solve problems, it creates them.

  6. Jay Reese

    Tolls road are an effective way of ensuring those who use the roads pay for them. For far to long drivers have been undercharged for the privilege of driving and now our infrastructure is a mess. Higher user fees such as the gas tax and tolls are necessary to fund infrastructure development and are a good way to encourage drivers to switch to alternative modes of transit. In addition the Government needs to stop redirecting fees collected from drivers away from infrastructure projects.

    • Steve

      Fun Fact: Drivers already pay for the roads with fuel taxes. Bikes do not contribute to the infrasturcture needs what so ever. #hardtruth Bikers are and will always be the minority in a town with our geography.

      • Jay Reese

        Topography has little to do with a city’s bicycle mode share given many of the best city’s for cycling are hilly and cold. What’s important is the quality of the bicycle infrastructure. Provide safe access to the roads and people will switch from driving to cycling.

        If you read the link offered by Luther you will see your users fees fall short of totally funding the system and so tax money from the general fund must be used to subsidize development. Also cyclist don’t damage to the roads like your heavier faster vehicles

  7. Pat

    Unfortunately, Asheville is following the path of other big cities– growth for the sake of growth — more roads & traffic, more pollution, less green space, etc. Ultimately its character will be destroyed as it becomes just another Charlotte.

    Of course, it’s difficult to stop the DOT from proceeding with its pet projects, but why not think in terms of something completely radical and different? Asheville could cap its population to a certain number of residents and anyone who wanted to move to the city would pay the city a relocation fee ($5K or some amount based on income), for a permit to move there. Through attrition new space becomes available. Relocation fees could be used for parks or bike trails to improve the city, not just make it bigger.

    Yes, this would create many other problems, but none more destructive than never ending growth requiring large scale construction projects just to keep up, and to what end? There isn’t enough space to accommodate everyone and still maintain the beauty and character of the city. Everyone should face the fact that the city, like the earth, is finite and growth doesn’t solve problems, it creates them.

    Pat Bas

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.