Buncombe boards highlight development pressures

Martin Moore at Feb. 2 Buncombe County Boad of Commissioners meeting
MORE MONEY, MOORE PROBLEMS: Martin Moore, chair of the Buncombe County Board of Adjustment, told county commissioners on Feb. 2 that his board had recently faced marathon sessions over the approval of big-budget developments such as the 660-unit 20 South Bear Creek complex. Screen capture courtesy of Buncombe County

When attorney Martin Moore first joined the Buncombe County Board of Adjustment about three years ago, he said, the body mostly helped “everyday people with everyday problems.” Those coming before the all-volunteer board, its chair recalls, were primarily “neighbors” looking for relatively small tweaks to county zoning regulations.

But over time, Moore told the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners during a Feb. 2 meeting, the Board of Adjustment has become a battleground for some of the county’s most contentious developments. Projects such as the 660-unit 20 South Bear Creek complex and 852-unit Busbee apartments have faced marathon hearings — some over nine hours — fiercely debated by opposing legal teams.

As previously reported by Xpress (see “Best laid plans,” Dec. 2), Board of Commissioners Chair Brownie Newman has named revisions to Buncombe land use policy as one of the top three priorities for his new term. Moore’s presentation, as well as a subsequent report from Buncombe County Planning Board Chair Nancy Waldrop, indicated that the county remains interested in changing its approach to development.

Although Moore assured commissioners that his board was up to the challenge of hearing complicated legal arguments over big projects, both Newman and Commissioner Jasmine Beach-Ferrara suggested that the county should reconsider its duties. “It behooves us, when we see a volunteer board taking on a workload this substantial and complex, to really take a fresh look at how that’s going for those volunteers, and also maybe questions we should be asking from a policy standpoint,” she said.

Similarly, Waldrop said the Planning Board had reviewed applications for more and larger major subdivisions in 2020 than in any previous year. She expressed some frustration over the board’s legal role, which only involves ensuring that developers have complied with county ordinances and provides little discretion over project design.

“We’re really — I don’t want to say a rubber stamp, but that’s what it feels like at some times,” Waldrop explained. “It sometimes makes us feel like we don’t really have a role to play. We’re just sort of filling in a spot, that we’re being checked off as a box.”

Waldrop said the board recommended an audit of the county subdivision ordinance with an eye toward protecting open space and ensuring adequate infrastructure, as well as an audit of the Community-Oriented Development program designed to bolster affordable housing. And the county’s upcoming comprehensive land use plan, she continued, should reconsider zoning in anticipation of climate-change impacts such as landslides and flooding.

Nathan Pennington, Buncombe’s planning and development director, emphasized that the county’s land use challenges are only expected to continue as time goes on. “We’ll see what 2021 turns out, but we do not see an abatement to the development boom,” he said.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Daniel Walton
Daniel Walton is the former news editor of Mountain Xpress. His work has also appeared in Sierra, The Guardian, and Civil Eats, among other national and regional publications. Follow me @DanielWWalton

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Buncombe boards highlight development pressures

  1. indy499

    Housing is an obviously complicted story but the US is growing and will add 30-40 million people in the next 25 years or so. A chunk of those people are going to live “here” in some form or other.

    Our leaders appear to love rules new and old which drive up costs, but want want affordable housing. We also are generally opposed in in-fill projects that add density (esp a NIMBY issue) but think sprawl is horrible.

    Need more density folks or all the growth will be just outside Buncombe adding to congestion and environmental issues. Doubt the county has the leadership to deal with this. I know the city doesn’t.

    • NIMBY

      Yes! We need density, density, density. The city’s failed leadership won’t get there. Hopefully the county’s will.

  2. Austin

    I picture Beavis and Butthead pounding on a table while calling “Density” over and over again. This is and always has been a moot issue. Local landowner sells country land, developer develops it. Repeat. You can’t stop it and “building density” is just another stupid tag line for some activist who wants what they can’t control. Sure yeah, build up Asheville. But don’t be so stupid and selfish to think you can control county landowners. I’ve said it before and I will say it again, the person who wants a condo in downtown Asheville is not the same person who wants a country home. What kink of idiot would think building density in Asheville would relieve urban bloat? Blah blah blah blah…..

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.