Buncombe shares early goals for tourism dollars

CONNECT THE DOTS: Buncombe County and its municipalities have identified a number of projects for potential Tourism Development Authority funding, as shown in a conceptual graphic presented to the Board of Commissioners June 18. Graphic courtesy of Buncombe County

As the Buncombe County Tourism Development Authority continues a yearlong project to assess how it divvies up millions of dollars in occupancy tax revenue, Buncombe County government is cooking up a proposal for its own piece of the pie. Tim Love, director of intergovernmental projects, shared preliminary results from the county’s contribution to the Tourism Management & Investment Plan at a June 18 pre-meeting of the Board of Commissioners.

The TDA process aims to shift spending of its Tourism Product Development Fund — the 25% of occupancy tax earmarked for community investment, or roughly $6.75 million this fiscal year — to a longer-term vision. Funding awards are on hold for now as the planning project continues.

Buncombe’s strategic thinking on tourism, Love explained, has focused on “the circulation of tourists to our unique, eclectic and vibrant community destinations.” Compared to the relatively dense city of Asheville, he said, the county’s attractions are spread across 660 square miles and small municipalities such as Montreat, Weaverville and Woodfin.

With that goal in mind, Love listed a number of “core projects” that county staff and municipal partners had tentatively identified as candidates for TDA support. State legislation, he reminded the commissioners, limits occupancy tax spending to brick-and-mortar capital expenses with the potential to generate new overnight stays in Buncombe County.

In Black Mountain, Love suggested, such work could include a quarter-mile of new greenways connecting the town’s existing system with the Montreat Conference Center and its hiking trails. Weaverville could get new greenway-connected trails around a proposed community center at Lake Louise, while Woodfin might see tournament-quality soccer fields built on a former landfill that could be reached by both greenways and the Craggy Mountain Line railroad.

Perhaps the most ambitious project on the docket is a recreation complex on the 45-acre former location of Beacon Manufacturing in Swannanoa. Love said the plan could include up to 12 full-size basketball courts and a sports medicine facility; although the site has been designated as a brownfield by state regulators, he said the property was suitable for nonresidential development.

Commissioners thanked county staff members for their work, but several wondered if the TDA’s long-term planning could be expanded beyond individual projects alone. Al Whitesides suggested that the authority’s enabling state legislation could be revisited, given the explosive growth of tourism in recent years.

“Nobody thought, back in the ’80s when this was put in place, that we would have $25 million or more a year coming in,” Whitesides said. “When you look at the number of hotels and motels and the stress they’re putting on the infrastructure in Asheville and Buncombe County, we need to revisit that.”

Commission Vice Chair Jasmine Beach-Ferrara asked if the TDA would consider a “high-level dialogue” around using occupancy tax money to support infrastructure and core government services in the local communities that tourists visit. Love noted that the topic had been broached but tended to run aground on the limits of the state statute.

“I know that context,” Beach-Ferrara responded. “Tourism brings a lot to this community; it also brings wear and tear and pressure on services. … I would be interested in having a more robust conversation about that.”

SHARE
About Daniel Walton
Daniel Walton is the Green Scene editor and a reporter for Mountain Xpress. His work has previously appeared in Capital at Play, Edible Asheville, and the Citizen-Times, among other area publications. Follow me @DanielWWalton

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Buncombe shares early goals for tourism dollars

  1. Mike R.

    Oh this is rich! Take the tourism tax receipts earned almost exclusively from in and around downtown Asheville and use them to for nice to have projects in outlying towns like Swan – a- know -a (now there’s a hot tourist spot!) or Wood – Fin (they have a Moe’s barbecue and a new storage center being built on the highway that tourist’s can ogle over).

  2. TDA is corrupt and must be stopped

    Wool over the taxpayers eyes is what this is.
    Don’t be fooled. This is taxpayer money being controlled by private citizens for their own benefit. The city and county could do much better with this tax money than these projects. Don’t forget about the crumbling infrastructure while you are enjoying the new historic water wheel!

    • luther blissett

      As you have noted, the prospect of amending state law seems dim, but the county retains the power to adjust the occupancy tax rate. Given that the TDA’s admin budget is calculated as a percentage of net revenues, it would be hardball politics for the county commission to say “lobby to amend the controlling statute or we’ll halve your annual haul” but it’s probably going to take hardball to prevent the TDA from having more to spend on YouTube ads than Weaverville has to spend on everything.

  3. Terri Fuller

    I live in Black Mountain and we have requested grants in the past only to be overlooked. Asheville is taking most of the occupancy tax being created by our outlaying towns. We do not get the amount of money our town generates from lodging. TDA does need to restructure its allocations to be “fair” to all.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.