“I must licky you:” APD denies sexual harassment, but admits lewd text messages were sent

In defenses filed against the sexual harassment suit brought by Asheville Police Department Officer Cherie Byrd — attorneys for both the APD and Byrd’s former superior, Sgt. Eric Lauffer, admit Lauffer sent explicit text messages to Byrd that include “I must licky you” and “You have just been phone fucked!”  but they deny any wrongdoing in the case.

“Admitted: that Lauffer forwarded texts with the described content to members of the [Drug Suppression Unit, where Byrd worked], including the Plaintiff. The remaining allegations [contained in Byrd’s assertions about the texts] are denied,” reads the defense’s rebuttal to two points of her allegations.

Just what contents does the APD admit that Lauffer sent? Byrd’s suit asserts, and Lauffer’s defense admits, that the following was sent by Lauffer: “By way of example, and not of limitation, one text featured a cartoon character humping the floor with the caption ‘I’d hit it like this.’ Lauffer added the following text to the message: ‘You have just been phone fucked! P.S. you cannot fuck me back no matter how bad you may wanna.’ Other texts contained messages such as ‘I must licky you’ and ‘I am just a man. Never satisfied always wanting more.’ He also texted her a picture of the back side of a naked man and implied in another message that she was a ‘ho.’”

The APD also admits that Lauffer sent other text messages, which Byrd’s suit argues were racist: “Lauffer also sent text messages to Ms. Byrd derogative of the African American race and highly offensive to Ms. Byrd. For example, in November, 2008, he said that ‘the election is making me sick’ because he had the ‘Obama flu’ and that ‘due to recent events: grape soda, red kool-aid, fried chicken, malt liquor, menthol cigarettes and gold teeth will be tax exempt.’”

The APD and Lauffer’s defenses contend that the charges should be dismissed on a variety of grounds, alleging, in the APD’s case, that Byrd “did not suffer a ‘tangible employment action,’ the City and APD exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any alleged harassing conduct and the Plaintiff unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities.”

While admitting the content of the text messages sent to Byrd, attorneys for the APD and Lauffer deny that he pervasively called her after hours, instead asserting that he called her, along with other members of the DSU, simply to gather socially.

The defenses admit that Lauffer’s supervisor, Lt. Chris Young, didn’t take action after Lauffer’s text messages were brought to his attention, but the defenses deny that Chief Bill Hogan, along with other city officials, failed to take action when Byrd brought her concerns forward to them, asserting instead that Byrd had originally requested that no action be taken. It asserts that the APD’s internal affairs wing did investigate the matter, “that some of the charges were sustained and some were not,” and that Byrd could not be told the full details of that investigation because it was a personnel matter.

The defenses also deny that the APD treated female officers differently, that the APD denied Byrd mental health care after she was fired upon in the line of duty, and that Byrd was kept under Lauffer’s supervision after her complaints came forward.

Byrd has sued for damages, asserting that working under Lauffer’s supervision made her job impossible and eventually led to an inability to continue employment with the APD and endangered her future career in law enforcement. The defenses call for all charges to be dismissed, and Byrd to pay all the court costs.

— David Forbes, senior reporter

Read Byrd’s original suit here, and the APD’s defense here.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

13 thoughts on ““I must licky you:” APD denies sexual harassment, but admits lewd text messages were sent

  1. T100C-1970

    Is SGT Lauffer still with the APD?? If so, the APD should take a budget hit equal to his salary + benefits, and that cost should be deducted from the salary of his superiors.

  2. whoomah

    This is gonna cost the city a lot more than the Benefits Department’s embezzelment.

  3. Of course they are going to deny anything that is not on record in the form of a text message or email. The undeniable texts and emails speak volumes, and one can easily see how the implications could and world make for a very hostile work place environment.

  4. Dionysis

    What a bunch of weak excuses by the city. I’m not a lawyer, but have spent many years administering labor and employment law regulations in workplace settings (among other things) and this is a near textbook case of a hostile work environment. No remedial action was taken in light of the complaints, and to claim that female officers weren’t treated differently is patently false on its face (any email or voice mail messages of a similar nature received by male officers?).

    A first year law student would know better than the (apparently) inept lawyers advising the city.

  5. LOKEL


    It sounds like it is time for a few “gentlemen” at the top of the APD to resign or be let go …. and by example the leader Hogan should be the first to go.

  6. travelah

    Lauffer is a complete moron. Why would APD keep such an officer with this kind of poor judgment?

  7. stratman

    Typical of the “good old boys” network and mentality of the APD. Time for some heads to roll, starting with, but not limited to, Lauffer and his immediate supervision.

  8. Tommy Rickenbock

    Sounds like the sgt. has a good sense of humor to me and you so called liberals need to loosen up your flappers.

  9. Dionysis

    “Sounds like the sgt. has a good sense of humor to me and you so called liberals need to loosen up your flappers.”

    Yes, boorish, knuckle-dragging, sexist and racist comments that seem to violate federal law is a real gut-buster alright. Silly not to see the humor in it.

  10. HuhHuh

    If that’s how they treat their own kind, makes you wonder what they are willing to do to you!

  11. cwaster

    Amazing. In my opinion clear racism and sexual harassment. Heads need to roll.

  12. Betty Cloer Wallace

    In a benign context, “I must licky you” is humorous.

    In a workplace, it is sexual harassment, especially when added to all the other sexist and racist comments.

    In the eyes of the public, the way this has been handled by the APD casts the department in a disreputable light that might not be rectified anytime soon.

    What this deplorable situation has done and will do to our city’s reputation as a safe and secure place to live and work is incalculable.

  13. bobloblaw

    Is the APD a frat house or a “Nationally accredited agency” ? Really ? We pay these “officers”salaries ?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.