Asheville City Council preview: Biltmore brawl

With Asheville City Council’s last meeting cancelled due to snow, its Jan. 25 session promises to be a marathon night. Front and center is the 51 Biltmore project, a proposed parking deck/hotel/retail development that’s become an extremely contentious issue.

To the project’s supporters (including, the last time parts of it it came up for a vote, most of Council) the partnership between the city, Public Interest Projects and the McKibbon hotel group will bring the city an important source of revenue and help spur denser development in the Biltmore Avenue area of downtown. To its detractors (including Council member Cecil Bothwell), the deal is an overpriced misuse of public funds at a time when the city needs to focus its efforts on alternative sources of transportation or sidewalks. The $14.8 million for the project won’t come out of city coffers, but through private loans, to be paid back with parking deck revenues.

Earlier this month, the advocacy group People Advocating Real Conservancy, who have vocally opposed the project, squared off with PIP President Pat Whalen in dueling e-mail missives, with PARC also criticizing PIP itself. Opponents of the project are trying to rally their forces, and late last week, Council member Gordon Smith reported receiving over 200 e-mails on the topic.

That brouhaha isn’t the only matter on Council’s plate. Council will also consider selling the W.C. Reid Center to the Housing Authority, sustainability recommendations for its development incentives, approving signage for Mission Hospitals and deciding on the city’s General Assembly legislative goals. Council will also receive updates on matters such as metered handicapped parking and sidewalks.

The Asheville City Council meeting begins at 5 p.m. on the second floor of City Hall.

— David Forbes, senior news reporter


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Asheville City Council preview: Biltmore brawl

  1. Update: I have now answered more than 400 e-mails on this topic, twelve in support of the project, the others opposed. (Am not tallying neutral/informational type e-mails).

  2. kenneth fulford

    The basic goal in allowing comments on Xpress articles is to try to bring meaningful information to the dialogue while staying respectful of others.

    In confirmation with the above statement and the avowed toning-down of public discourse in an effort to diminish inflammatory dialogue, I suggest the 51 Biltmore Brawl could have better been headlined as the Biltmore issue or Biltmore project – and while it may be a contentious issue (already stated) the word business could easily replace brouhaha and its sensational meaning.

  3. indy499

    News flash Cecil, the people who email you represent a skewed sample of the Asheville population. 400 means nothing in a city Asheville’s size. 12 for the project and 388 opposed and you go down 2-5. Sounds about right.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.