Parkside will still need city, county approval for permits

Despite changing plans twice to avoid a vote before Asheville City Council or the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners, the controversial Parkside project will still need city and county approval for road and emergency-services easements.

That was the word today from Shannon Tuch, acting Asheville planning director, in the wake of a new application that developer Stewart Coleman submitted June 11. That new plan, by changing where construction equipment is based, avoids needing the commissioners’ approval for an affidavit. It was the second change Coleman had made in less than a month. Earlier, he reduced the height of the project, avoiding a vote before City Council.

Council subsequently condemned, unanimously, the original land sale that allowed Coleman to purchase a piece of public parkland. The commissioners approved that sale in 2006 after discussing it briefly and originally putting it on the consent agenda (a list of routine matters usually handled by a single vote). Vice Chair David Gantt has said that he regrets the sale and was unclear at the time about the property’s location.

“We’ve accepted the plan — all the details are straight and it meets our quality standards — and we’re reviewing the information now,” Tuch told Xpress. “That’s the last step before it goes to TRC [the city’s Technical Review Committee]. We’re still going to need county approval when it comes to permits.”

The project is scheduled to go before the TRC, which can only consider technical issues, on July 7. But that won’t be the last hurdle.

“They’ll need an easement from the city and the county to build the road he [Coleman] has proposed to run in front of the building,” Tuch said. “They’ll also need county approval for a no-build easement on the east side of the building for emergency services.”

The commissioners were originally scheduled to vote on the affidavit at their June 24 meeting. Yesterday, Chairman Nathan Ramsey said the board will still discuss the issue.

““It should still be on the agenda; it’s my personal feeling that we need to discuss our options,” he said. “There’s definitely going to be some discussion about how we can resolve this in a better way.”

For more information on the changes to the Parkside project, see the June 18 issue of Mountain Xpress, on the stands tomorrow.

— David Forbes, staff writer


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Parkside will still need city, county approval for permits

  1. LOKEL

    This article is a bit misleading: the “road he wants to build” has already been removed from the plans as well.

  2. Barry Summers

    No, Mr. Coleman is misleading (big surprise), and you have allowed yourself to be misled. According to the AC-T, Mr. Coleman’s statement was that, “he has decided against building the street, at least FOR NOW.” (emphasis mine)

    I have seen the latest plans, and the “road he wants to build” is STILL THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE. Wait until he gets his permits, wait til the construction starts, wait til the controversy dies down, & then magically, the road will re-appear.

  3. William P Miller

    The County needs to condemn this property through emminent domain and take it back for the people. It was illegally sold by developer toadies on the Commission. Peterson and Stanley, are your ears burning?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.