Council approves affordability changes for RAD development

RAD Lofts rendering
LOFTY AMBITIONS: Seen here in a concept rendering, the RAD Lofts project would bring 243 residential units, 358 parking spaces and 17,000 square feet of commercial space to the River Arts District. Graphic courtesy of Harry Pilos

After more than six years and six separate appearances at Asheville City Council, the RAD Lofts development obtained its latest approval on March 10. Council narrowly voted to OK new affordability conditions for the River Arts District project, with members Sheneika Smith, Brian Haynes and Keith Young opposed.

First approved in October 2013, RAD Lofts will contain 243 residential units, 358 garage parking spaces and 17,000 square feet of commercial space, which developer Harry Pilos said would include a “New York-style” organic grocery store. That initial approval also required 5% of the units to be affordable for renters making 80% of the area median income ($53,120 for a family of four), with the remaining 95% affordable to those at or below the city’s workforce housing baseline, or 120% of AMI.

After claiming to face “difficulties securing financing for the project” because of those conditions, Pilos requested to change the portion of affordable units to 10%, with rents guaranteed for 10 years, and designate the remaining units as market rate. The new arrangement also had the development forgo a $764,000 Land Use Incentive Grant awarded by the city in 2015

During the March 10 meeting, Pilos offered to accept Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development program to help low-income families pay for housing, for the affordable units. He also said that he intended to donate $100,000 to both the Asheville Buncombe Community Land Trust and THRIVE, a subsidiary of the University of North Carolina. 

Mayor Esther Manheimer praised the development for meeting the goals of the city’s River Arts District Transportation Improvement Project, a multimillion-dollar investment plan meant to spur growth in the once-industrial area, and for contributing to “blended” incomes and housing in the neighborhood. She added that the property, currently a brownfield site, is contaminated from nearly a century of previous use as a steel fabrication facility.

But Smith, a three-generation native of the Southside community, said she did not support the development because of its potential to gentrify a historically African American neighborhood. The project, located at 146 and 179 Roberts St., is located in a census tract where a majority of residents are African American and roughly 40% live below the poverty line. 

“By saying that, after redlining, [the] response to gentrification is some blended model — yeah, that is great for Asheville at large. But what my community cannot regain in that model, and other models on the table proposed right now, is a sense of belonging and a sense of ownership,” Smith said. “Hats off to your response to gentrification and the brownfield remediation, but there are some things that are not very satisfying to all.”

In other news

Fifteen people, including members of the Sierra Club’s Western North Carolina chapter, spoke during public comment in support of a 3-cent property tax increase proposed in January by Council members Young and Julie Mayfield. The plan aims to generate $4.5 million for public transit, tree canopy protection, home weatherization for low-income residents and affordable housing. 

Council members will meet at 8 a.m. on Friday, March 13, at the Harrah’s Cherokee Center – Asheville for their annual retreat to discuss the upcoming budget and other priorities.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

7 thoughts on “Council approves affordability changes for RAD development

  1. Enlightened Enigma

    Historically, REAL and REASONABLE towns and cities across America EMBRACED gentrification. With this project not displacing anyone and providing lots of new housing what is their problem? Let the man build his project and supply the need! Elected officials who oppose this are sabotaging housing development !!! Make that known! Sabotage.

  2. Wash

    Claiming this town needs more affordable housing and in the same meeting pushes for a property tax increase. Mayfield is another worthless politician. They should all take a pay cut and donate their salaries to people who struggle with rent.

  3. indy499

    Nothing the 3 weakest links on an already weak council do surprises me.
    We desperately need in town apartment supply. Creating that housing on a site that makes the pit of despair look attractive is a major plus.
    Haynes doesn’t have the horsepower to assess anything so thinks he’s playing it safe by voting no. Guess he can’t figure out that we have a supply shortage. Maybe the apartment fairy will show up.
    Smith living in the past. Can’t move forward because (fill in the blank) happened in (insert date).
    Young, well, doesn’t even live in Asheville so who cares?

    • Lulz

      LOL it’s a joke. Prepare for the automatic property tax increases because a non-profit is God. And us mere peons are garbage with no voice.

  4. Jonathan Wainscott

    146 Roberts Street is only 2.5 miles from Woodfin (where Riverside Drive meets Broadway) and it’s 3.8 miles from the ABC Store on Hendersonville Road (Shilo).

  5. Austin

    Not surprised to see Mayfield’s name attached to the property tax increase. Just about every time I hear her name it’s for something I don’t support. I was astonished to see how much support she received in the latest election. My dem’s have the blinders on for some reason and can’t grasp how illogical and useless she is. Wake up people! This woman doesn’t have a creative bone or unique thought in her being.

    • Enlightened Enigma

      she’s a loiwyer…she must constantly try to prove her knowledge and value …

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.