Council seeks clarity on proposed budget, potential tax hike

WANTS AND NEEDS: The proposed 2021-22 budget includes $9.9 million in new city spending — $1.7 million of which would be funded with expected salary savings from roughly 70 unfilled positions within the Asheville Police Department. Graphic courtesy of the city of Asheville

It was only a few months ago — September, to be exact — that Asheville City Council approved its fiscal year 2020-21 budget as the city grappled with overlapping health and social justice crises. 

“As you know, our city budget is usually adopted by July 1. But as you also know, last year was a very unusual year,” said City Manager Debra Campbell during Council’s May 25 meeting.

While the proposed fiscal year 2021-22 budget is on track to meet this year’s deadline, some Council members have raised concerns over Campbell’s recommendations, particularly regarding reparations funding, a proposed property tax increase and the use of savings from police vacancies.

Mayor Esther Manheimer pointed out that $1.7 million of approximately $9.9 million in new city spending would be funded with expected salary savings from roughly 70 unfilled positions within the Asheville Police Department. Once those positions are filled, she pointed out, the money would not be available to cover recurring expenses in subsequent years. 

“[The fundings is] eventually going to dwindle down,” acknowledged Tony McDowell, the city’s finance director. “We can probably count on some savings from vacancies for the next couple of years, but eventually that savings is going to be used up by having to fill positions. It’s kind of a hybrid between a one-time and an ongoing source [of revenue].”

McDowell did not provide a plan for how the city would cover the new expenses once all police positions had been filled. Manheimer asked city staff to parse out ongoing and one-time costs and revenues and reevaluate the budget in light of that information.

Meanwhile, Council member Antanette Mosley noted community concerns about the $1.2 million allocated in the budget for Asheville’s reparations initiative. She explained that she’d received emails from several residents who believed that the investment would be covered by the city’s proposed tax hike of 3 cents per $100 in property value, which may disproportionately impact Black communities as a result of Buncombe County’s recent property revaluation.

“There’s been quite a bit of consternation about — this is the language in the community — raising taxes, particularly on Black folks, to help pay for reparations,” Mosely said.

McDowell said that the reparations funding would be drawn from the city’s fiscal reserves, not the new money generated by the tax increase. However, the bulk of the money that would eventually replenish those reserves consists of property tax revenue. 

A public hearing on the proposed budget will take place on Tuesday, June 8, during the regularly scheduled Council meeting. The final vote on whether to adopt the budget will take place on Tuesday, June 22. 

In other news

Council members voted 6-0 in support of a $2.5 million purchase of downtown property at 50 Asheland Ave. The nonprofit Dogwood Health Trust will contribute $1.25 million toward the purchase, with city funds covering the remainder. 

The property borders the Asheville Rides Transit bus station at 49 Coxe Ave. and is earmarked for a “transit-oriented development” that would combine a larger transit center with affordable housing and commercial space. Manheimer recused herself from the vote due to an unspecified conflict of interest.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

7 thoughts on “Council seeks clarity on proposed budget, potential tax hike

  1. Taxpayer

    So a million $$ for reparations and also $200k for the “process”? Bullsh!t. Appoint a committee to work the process. It’s apparent the staff of Asheville can’t do anything but hire some outside consultant to tell them what to do. There are intelligent people here. Use them since staff apparently can’t come up with any recommendations themselves. Why does COA have to hire out of state consultants for every decision or recommendation? Isn’t that what they’re PAID to do? WTH?

    • luther blissett

      Completely agree. It’s not correct that the property tax increase is going into the reparations fund — or the ridiculous “process” around the fund — but it’s not entirely incorrect either. The community isn’t dumb. The “process” is setting itself up to be another Pit of Despair, where council members and staff keep shoveling money at outside consultants because they are terrified of making decisions.

      City council could have said “we’ve just had a reassessment during an unprecedented combination of economic shock and real estate boom: let’s make this year revenue-neutral and come back next year when the dust has settled.” It can still do that.

  2. RWD

    VOTE EM OUT !!! They are just to darn complacent and want ZERO confrontation !!

    • Enlightened Enigma

      but WHO will we replace them WITH ? more of the same non leadership ?

      • luther blissett

        WHO indeed? Are you saying that you wouldn’t be able to do the job?

        Once again: it costs $75 to file for election and you have about a year to save up. This is not and has never been snark: if you actually want government to better reflect your beliefs and priorities there is no better or more direct way than to run for office.

  3. Liam

    Tax us into oblivian but hold on there is a complaint: “There’s been quite a bit of consternation about — this is the language in the community — raising taxes, particularly on Black folks, to help pay for reparations,” Mosely said.” Apparently, only complaints by blacks rise to a level of concern and the irony of all time, their taxes will have to be pooled into the reparation payments…and they complain…!

    • indy499

      Mosely might step out and talk to some white folks too. She’d find that the community thinks the tax increase (assessment x rate) is absolutely absurd. I don’t want to hear a beep from the bozo council about affordable housing as the taxes keep soaring.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.