Council to hear updated Flatiron proposal, solidify districting work session

Asheville city seal

Mayor Esther Manheimer will be phoning it in to the Tuesday, June 25, meeting of Asheville City Council — literally. The mayor, who will be more than 800 miles away in Michigan, plans to attend the meeting by phone but still fully participate in all public hearings and votes.

And there will be no shortage of discussion. Council will once again consider a proposal to rezone 20 Battery Park Ave, better known as the Flatiron Building, to allow its conversion into a hotel.The original proposal was pulled by the developer’s attorney, Wyatt Stevens, before Council members could take action on May 14 after a majority voiced their lack of support.

The updated version of the project reduces the number of hotel rooms from 80 to 71 and preserves commercial office space on the building’s second floor. Displacement of the Flatiron’s small business tenants was one of the central concerns opponents voiced during the last public hearing, which was attended by roughly 100 people. However, the new proposal maintains earlier plans to include a restaurant, ground-floor retail spaces and off-site parking that would be managed by a valet service.

Council also plans to schedule a work session at 5 p.m. on Tuesday, July 2, to discuss the city’s options for challenging the state law that imposes districts for municipal elections. The move, included on the meeting’s consent agenda, follows a June 6 op-ed in the Citizen Times by Council members Sheneika Smith, Brian Haynes and Keith Young, who called for action to oppose the law. Vijay Kapoor also released a statement June 10 in support of districting.

The resolution announcing the meeting notes that “a motion is anticipated to suspend the rules and allow public comment.” The work session will also take place in the Banquet Hall of the U.S. Cellular Center, rather than Council chambers, in anticipation of a large turnout.

In other business

Council will conduct two public hearings on the renaming of two city streets. The first will consider changing the most southern portion of Park Avenue North to Artful Way to eliminate duplicate street names and avoid confusion during emergency response events; the second involves renaming Wilbar Avenue to Lee Garden Lane. In that case, the developer is requesting to name a proposed new access drive for Lee Walker Heights, which has been rezoned for complete redevelopment of the existing housing complex.

City Manager Debra Campbell is also expected to deliver a report to Council members. No documents regarding that report were available on the city’s website as of press time.

Consent agenda

Council’s consent agenda for the meeting contains 14 items, which will be approved as a package unless singled out for separate discussion. Highlights include:

  • A resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a lease agreement with The Preservation Society of Asheville and Buncombe County for the historic, city-owned E.W. Grove Office, located at 324 Charlotte St. The Preservation Society has leased the property and made significant restorations to the building since 2007, which the city will value at $114,309 and apply toward the organization’s rent.
  • A budget amendment accepting a $177,000 donation from the Friends of the Nature Center to support the WNC Nature Center’s new front entrance, which was completed in 2018. The donation brings the group’s total support of the project to $884,000; the remaining $313,000 was provided by the Buncombe County Tourism Development Authority.
  • A resolution ratifying an interlocal agreement with the Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office concerning the redistribution of money and property seized by the Buncombe County Anticrime Task Force during its investigations. In the past, seized funds have remained with the BCAT, but federal guidelines required the new agreement, which will give the county 68.44% of the money and the Asheville Police Department 31.56%. Funds transferred to the APD will be used to support illegal drug investigations and related anticrime work.

Asheville City Council meets at 5 p.m. in Council chambers on the second floor of City Hall at 70 Court Plaza, Asheville. The full meeting agenda and supporting documents can be found here.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Council to hear updated Flatiron proposal, solidify districting work session

  1. SpareChange

    If an 80 room hotel, with all of the attendant parking, traffic, business displacement, and other related issues is your “problem.” Then a 71 room hotel is not your “answer.”

    That’s without even getting into the more macro-economic issues of furthering Asheville’s dependence on one industry, and buying into the nonsense argument that the “only” feasible use of the Flatiron building is to convert it into a hotel.

    • Mike R.

      My understanding is that while the Flatiron could be used for any number of functions physically, financially, only a hotel can provide the revenue and income needed to renovate the building. I doubt that conclusion isn’t too far from reality. Renovation of older buildings is very expensive and I don’t think there is enough demand for high price rental in the downtown to fill the buildlng. Wishing it was that way doesn’t change the reality.

      While I’m not keen on another hotel; this one should be approved to preserve the building. Cut back on the next hotel request, if possible.

  2. Enlightened Enigma

    wouldn’t it be hilarious if the owner decided to tear it down and build a new ultra modern 20 story!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.