From CPP: Crowded field with many impeachment views in District 11

Debbie Stamey at March 2016 primary
Haywood County precinct Chief Judge Debbie Stamey interacts with David Cairnes as he presents his photo ID at the Canton Public Library to vote in the March 2016 primary. NC congressional District 11 voters in 2020 will seek to fill an empty seat, choosing between candidates with a range of views on impeachment. Photo by Colby Rabon, courtesy of Carolina Public Press

By Kate Martin, Carolina Public Press. Carolina Public Press is an independent, in-depth and investigative nonprofit news service for North Carolina.

In NC congressional District 11, incumbent Republican Mark Meadows has been vocal on his support for President Donald Trump during the impeachment proceedings.

In an opinion piece published on the Fox News website, Meadows lambasted the Democrats for proceeding with impeachment without the basis of fact or merit.

“It has been the Democrats’ single-minded goal this entire Congress. They are an angry mob seeking validation. An impeachment machine in search of a cause,” Meadows wrote in part. “But this effort to undermine the president will fail, just like their other attempts. Americans will see through it.”

The day after Trump was impeached by the House, Meadows announced late last month that he was retiring from Congress at the end of his term. The 11th Congressional District was recently redrawn by legislators. Meadows hinted at a role in the Trump administration, saying in his retirement statement, “My work with President Trump and his administration is only beginning.”

The vacancy has resulted in a scramble for the territory from a crowded field of 19 candidates.

Democrat Gina Collias said she would have voted for both articles of impeachment, likening the impeachment process to an indictment from a grand jury.

“The direct testimony of the State Department and military officials, combined with the text derived from the president’s Ukraine call – and the president’s initial comments on the White House lawn – were troubling and require further investigation by the Senate. Certainly, no one is above the law,” Collias said.

Collias said she is concerned that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, and other senators are working directly with the White House to defend Trump. “This is supposed to be a fact-finding endeavor with an impartial jury.”

Republican Jim Davis, five-term state senator from Western North Carolina, said the entire impeachment process has been a “charade.”

Had he been in the House of Representatives when the impeachment vote took place, Davis said, “I would have voted not to impeach because I haven’t seen any evidence of an impeachable offense. If anybody’s got any, I’d be interested in hearing it.

“It’s a political process, and they don’t have any evidence of impeachable offenses, and so they are making up charges.”

Retired U.S. Air Force Col. and Democrat Moe Davis said he would have voted in favor of impeachment because the evidence is “clear and overwhelming” that Trump pressured Ukraine to interfere in the upcoming election.

“You can’t stand with Donald J. Trump and with America. I’ve worked alongside true patriots from the FBI and CIA and I’ve sweated in chem gear training to defend against Russia. Trump and his GOP clan can have Putin. I choose America and all those who defend her,” Davis wrote to CPP.

The lone Libertarian in the race, Tracey DeBruhl, answered CPP’s questions about impeachment by condemning the process in the House and critiquing the role of Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden.

“Biden exposed himself by having a son getting paid foreign aid money here on a four-month campaigning tour,” DeBruhl wrote. “As a command officer and businessman, my first question would have been, ‘What’s he getting paid for here, when the job is over there?’”

“When I’m your congressman, my first question, (to which) I’m going to seek an answer from Nancy Pelosi, is why was she so willing to put our country through this embarrassment, yet not even willing to police her own Democrats?”

However, DeBruhl indicated that did not mean that he thinks the president is beyond being held accountable and threatened to violently shake the chief executive if voters send DeBruhl to Washington.

“Marine Corps 101: Integrity comes from holding our own accountable first, which is how we teach quality and get better,” DeBruhl said.

“So, in order to help us get there … we got things I’m trying to fix here first. And if Trump’s still there when it’s my turn and not acting right? He’ll be LSU purple from my shaking the Clemson orange off of him.”

Democrat Steve Woodsmall said there is “overwhelming evidence” in favor of impeachment and he would have voted “yes” without hesitation.

“I actually called for impeachment the day after the Mueller report was released and am frankly surprised that those findings were not included in the articles of impeachment,” Woodsmall told CPP. “I also believe the process is taking entirely too long, as every day that Trump is in office results in more damage done to this country.”

Other candidates in this race did not respond to requests for comment or did not have contact information available.

To return to the main impeachment article, please click here.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.